User talk:Shannenpaglicawan

Speedy deletion nomination of Angie Watkins


Hello. A tag has been placed on Angie Watkins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please ping me (type    before your message). 05:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Angie Watkins


The article Angie Watkins has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:GNG and WP:NMODEL. News coverage does not indicate separate notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 15:12, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type    before your message. 14:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)