User talk:Shannip/sandbox

feedback
Hi. I saw your note that you did not receive feedback from a classmate for a peer review. That would be something you should contact your instructor about. As far as feedback for improvement, though, I can do that so that you have something to work on.
 * I think this layout is not user-friendly. You have too many sections and subsections, which is overwhelming the table of contents. Most of your sections and subsections are also very short. Instead of a subsection for each variant of the virus, I think it would be an improvement to have a bulleted list instead.
 * You have some issues with uncited content. You should never have a section or a paragraph end without a citation to a reliable source.

Let me know if you have questions! Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:06, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Cole's peer review
Hi Shanni,

I'd like to start off by saying that this article is very well informed, thought out, and researched. However, there are just a couple of things that I personally would change about the article.
 * 1) 1. As the original poster said, I don't think that the formatting is very user friendly. It took me a while to get used to the headings in the table of contents, and I don't know whether or not you meant to do this, but there are 28 sections under 1.3. Because many of them are very short, I think you could sum them up as different paragraphs of the same section.
 * 2) 2. I don't know anything about this virus, however, I think that there is either more information on it that you could share in these paragraphs or that maybe some of the information could be left out. Maybe it only looks how it does because of the formatting and I have zero clue what I'm talking about. It's your topic after all, not mine (LOL).

To sum it up, I think your article is really good! Just needs a little work on the formatting and it already looks like a full-fledged wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cole bodine (talk • contribs) 20:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi Cole! Thank you for your constructive criticism. As you can see, I completely restructured the Variants section, which should make it more readable. Additionally, I added some more information for some variants and added new ones altogether. I hope this makes it more readable! Shannip (talk) 02:11, 27 March 2019 (UTC)