User talk:Shannonob90

Welcome!

Hello, Shannonob90, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as PoolWerx, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 05:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of PoolWerx


A tag has been placed on PoolWerx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 05:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at PoolWerx
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please [ click here].

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to John O'Brien (PoolWerx). While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:09, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Reply to your request for help
I have read your message on my talk page. Language such as "Founder and current CEO John O'Brien took this successful concept and used his considerable experience to structure a sophisticated franchise system" is unambiguously promotional, and conflicts with Wikipedia policy. If you can see that then you should be able to rewrite the article in more neutral terms. Sometimes people who work in marketing are so accustomed to marketing speak and promotional language that they are desensitised to it, and genuinely cannot see that what they are writing is promotional. Since I don't know anything about you I have no idea whether that applies to you, but if it doesn't then it is just a question of common sense, and trying to imagine how your writing will appear to an uninvolved person. Apart from the promotional tone, your articles were fine, as far as I remember.

It is a good idea to start an article as a draft in your own "user space". That simply means giving it a title like User:Shannonob90/PoolWerx. It can then be moved to PoolWerx when it is ready. Even in user space, anything which looks like blatant spam will be deleted, but a good deal more leeway is allowed than would be the case in an article, since the page is not yet part of the public face of Wikipedia. I also strongly recommend putting at the top of the page to label the page as a draft. If you click on the red link User:Shannonob90/PoolWerx a blank page will open up for you to start editing.

If you like, when you have written your draft, you may like to list it at Requests for feedback. Sometimes that results in very useful advice on how to improve the draft before moving it from "user space" to "main space" as an article. Unfortunately, though, it doesn't always work: it depends purely on one or more people who check the list of requests having something useful to say. However, there is nothing to be lost by trying, and, as I said, sometimes it can be very useful.

I am also giving you a welcome message with various links that may be helpful. As you can see it has more links than the fairly basic welcome message that Jsfouche has given you at the top of this page. Don't try to read and learn the whole of all of the linked policies, guidelines etc: there are far too many of them. However, have a look and see if some of them are relevant to your current needs. Also, of course, you can always come back to others in the future as and when they become relevant to you.

I'm sorry that you have had a fairly unencouraging start to editing Wikipedia, and I do hope things work out better from now on. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:46, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * }

Speedy deletion nomination of John O'Brien (PoolWerx)


A tag has been placed on John O'Brien (PoolWerx), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  07:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of PoolWerx


A tag has been placed on PoolWerx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  07:25, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of John O'Brien (Australian businessman) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John O'Brien (Australian businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John O'Brien (Australian businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  18:28, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello Shannonob90. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Quick mini-survey about your editing experience
Hi Shannonob90,

You are one of a number of users who recently received a message from SDPatrolBot. I'm curious to hear about your experience with the speedy deletion process and how you feel about the message you received. Specifically, I'd like to know...
 * 1) Was the message clearly written?
 * 2) Was it helpful in communicating what you should do to save your article from getting deleted?
 * 3) Are there any changes you'd like to see made to such messages in the future that you think might make them more effective for new users?
 * 4) Any other observations you'd like to make about contesting a speedy deletion? How did you find the process overall?

If you'd prefer not to answer in a public space, you can feel free to email me your response (mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org), and I'll be sure to keep it private unless you indicate otherwise. Your observations and suggestions are really valuable for helping improve the new editor experience on Wikipedia, so any feedback you can give would be appreciated immensely! Thank you, Maryana (WMF) (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2012 (UTC)