User talk:Shantroywells

Shan wells
I've added the "prod" template to the article Shan wells, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Shan wells. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. GringoInChile 16:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Page has been replaced with information that satisfies the criteria for inclusion. Please notify why this should not be so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shantroywells (talk • contribs) 13:23, September 22, 2006

This entry has already been sent to articles for deletion. Verification was provided and a consensus reached that the article mertited inclusion. Please desist with the vanity listing, and check the history, here reposted: 21:16, 1 October 2006 Glen S (Talk | contribs) (afd - keep)

Thank you Shantroywells 04:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during September 22 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. ~  Flame viper  17:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

User talk page
Please do not remove legitimate messages from your talk page. Talk pages exist as a record of legitimate communication, and in any case, comments are available through the page history. You're welcome to archive your talk page, but be sure to provide a link to any deleted legitimate comments. Thanks. --Geniac 18:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletion
You should review Vanity guidelines before contributing articles that are entirely about yourself and your work; Wikipedia is not the place for self-promotion. To your specific question, a few articles in minor publications do not constitute notability; if you feel that some other article also fails to meet the notability guidelines, feel free to prod it or otherwise nominate it for deletion. You might also want to review Notability (people), which makes it clear that notability is only a guideline, not a policy, and that articles that meet the notability guidelines may still be deleted - to wit: ''Failure to meet these criteria does not mean that a subject must not be included; meeting one or more does not mean that a subject must be included. Many Wikipedians oppose the use of this guideline.'' Let me know if you have other questions. | Mr. Darcy talk 20:05, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Shan Wells
Please read WP:V and WP:LIVING. Sources need to be referenced in the article before the tags are removed. As it stands this is completely unsourced, even if it survived an AfD.--Isotope23 13:02, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

sources added
Thanks for provided guidance. Sources have been added. Please advise on how to add linkable footnotes-thanks.

importance added
Reason for inclusion is self evident. Please advise if more needed. Thanks.

Orphan autobot tag removed
Two internal links added as per guidelines.

Shan Wells
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Shan Wells worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. G ain  Line    ♠  ♥ 01:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Ecoart
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ecoart, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ecoartnetwork.org/aboutus.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ecoart


The article Ecoart has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * neologism with no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 19:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)