User talk:SharabSalam/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, شرعب السلام, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mstrojny (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Question
Hi, have you given any consideration to this message? Also, if you would like to archive your talk page posts as opposed to deleting them, please see this link for assistance with archiving. Have a nice day - wolf  02:00, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I replied here. Thank you again for your help. --SharabSalam (talk) 08:15, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Houthi parliament election
Hi Should we create an article about the election organized in 2019 in Yemen? --Panam2014 (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I guess we should. I will help to improve it if it was created.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * We have the artice Next Yemeni parliamentary election. --Panam2014 (talk) 23:21, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well... I have no idea. You can ask experienced editors on this matter.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Do you have sources about date, number of seats, etc ? --Panam2014 (talk) 23:41, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * the date is in April and I couldn't find how many seats are available but they said they will do two elections first for those who died and second for those who allied with the Hadi-government based on these sources

and I think it's still early to create an article about the elections. There isn't much available details about it --SharabSalam (talk) 00:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Warning
You have reverted, multiple times, my edits in article February 2019 Warsaw Conference, which all had reliable sources. Your work is an absolute violation of wikipedia regulations. I warn should you continue with this I shall have to report you to the administrators.Alex-h (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What?Where and when? provide diffs--SharabSalam (talk) 15:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I just took a look at the article and I have not reverted anything I deleted the meeting section because its already covered in the press con... and the other section because it was obv irrelevent to the article that wasnt even a revert that was improving the article and not multiple times as you implied. You can warn me if you want but read this first Don't shoot yourself in the foot --SharabSalam (talk) 15:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * You have reverted, multiple times, my edits 1 and 2, which all had reliable sources. Alex-h (talk) 06:59, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * And I have explained why I did that!! Even if it's sourced (although by biased sources) You add new sections for things that aren't reported in the media that much to be notable and tbh I didn't even know you before you sent me a message. I was trying to fix the article and now your informations are included in the article happy?--SharabSalam (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * And to be honest in the first diff you provided, I wasn't actually willing to delete the political gathering section that happened by an accident because you added that section just after I opened the editor and when I saved my edits (which was only deleting the meeting section because it's already mentioned in another section) the editor saved the version that I edited on and automatically deleted the section of "political gathering"--SharabSalam (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you for letting me know and I’m sure these things may happen naturally. As a matter of fact, the gathering in Warsaw was very important to me and I see it directly related to the summit. Anyway, I see you too were interested in the events in Warsaw, maybe we have something in common and can continue. Alex-h (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Exactly-SharabSalam (talk) 16:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanction alert
Wikiemirati (talk) 07:33, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 20:37, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Slavery, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Your personal dislike of the idea that Arabs were involved, along with Europeans and Africans, is not grounds for removal of content. The burden is on you to find consensus for removal.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I see now that the image in question was a recent edit that other editors have disputed. I've reverted to the article state that preceded that addition. The burden should have been on that editor to justify the addition.  Acroterion   (talk)   17:27, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikiemirati

 * Hello SharabSalam. I saw you also had probelms with Wikiemirati recently, and I too was also prey to this user aggresssive, vengeful like behavior such as engaging in WP:HOUNDING and edit-warring by him. Is it possible by any chance that you can give me some more information on this user and other instances where he has exhibited this behavior? Thank You.Mountain157 (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Edit Warring warning
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

March 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Abolitionism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

If this was your first block for edit warring then I would be much more sympathetic to the request above. I accept that everyone makes mistakes but how can we know that the same mistake will not keep happening? &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:47, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have gave my word that I will no longer edit in the articles that are related to slavery at least for the next six months. I am not really interested in these articles I am more interested in Yemen-related articles and I have done a lot of contributions in that area but that editor behaviour was provocative and as I said I couldn't hold myself.--SharabSalam (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You've got another chance. But it's not just slavery articles you need to be careful with - last time you were edit warring on Saudi Arabia. Stop after the first or second revert and go to the talk page &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Congratulations on getting unblocked! If you ever have any questions, please consult my talk page. :D

&#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 15:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC) 


 * Thank you so much!--SharabSalam (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Battle of Hajjah
Hi

Should we create an article? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Yea, why not? But should we call it battle of Hajjah or The battle of Hajour?--SharabSalam (talk) 16:23, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Because it is only between Hajour tribe and Houthis.--SharabSalam (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I think Hejour. But we should also add that the coalition have by opportunism, send weapons and made airstrikes. --Panam2014 (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jabal Sabir has been accepted
 Jabal Sabir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Jabal_Sabir help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * Finally! It seemed it would take forever. Thank you for these good news.——SharabSalam (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

March 2019
Your recent editing history at Qahtanite shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 09:40, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Arabian Peninsula
Order By most Arabian Peninsula land in each country Its so messy who put those country randmoly Check last edit in Arabian Peninsula ArabianWE (talk) 18:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Reminder about civility on Wikipedia
Just a quick reminder about WP:CIVIL! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sultanic (talk • contribs) 19:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

This is funny. You said I have anti-Saudi aganda? but in reality I am pro-Saudi Arabia and everybody in Wikipedia knows that I support Saudi Arabia. You are somehow pushing the idea that regime of Saudi Arabia has ordered the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi because you said I have anti-Saudi aganda because I was defending Khashoggi. That's basically mean you think 1-Khashoggi was guilty and that the government of Saudi Arabia should have executed him. or 2- You believe that Saudi Arabia ordered the killing of Jamal and you are trying to justify what the government did. In both cases you are being anti-Saudi Arabia because the Saudi regime itself has said that Khashoggi was a good man and they did funeral prayer for him and promised to execute those guilty of killing him. So how am I being anti-Saudi Arabia when I am defending Khashoggi?. I would also note that I am not pushing any point of view in Wikipedia.--SharabSalam (talk) 20:33, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Andrew Yang
Presidential candidate Andrew Yang studied mathematics and prelaw at Brown University. Please reupload this information back on his page
 * Sorry but Yang said "I went to Brown University and Columbia for law school, was an attorney for five months before trying my hand as an entrepreneur. My first dot-com business flopped, but then I worked at a series of other companies." https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/21/democrat-andrew-yang-running-for-president-on-platform-of-free-cash.html --SharabSalam (talk) 04:34, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Yemeni Parliament
Hi

34 MP have deseased. Did you know their name or their political repartition? And for the candidates for 13 April election, what is their affiliation? --Panam2014 (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Do you have source about the candidates elected? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes here http://yemenparliament.gov.ye/Details?Post=726 .this is the Houthi parliament sorry for not replying earlier I had internet connection issues and I didn't know who died and who are the other people who died. The elected president of the Hadi government Parliament is Sultan Al-Barakani. Do you know Arabic? Do you need me to translate the names of the elected candidates? --SharabSalam (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Sure, could you translate the names? Also, to knowing the name of MP who died, the solution is to have a source with the 301 initial seats (2003). And now, did you know the affiliation of new MPs? --Panam2014 (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

I dont know the affiliation of the new MPs but I will give the old MPs affliliation because most of the old and new MPs are relatives as it appears from their names. I dont know English very well this word "الدوائر" means circles in Arabic and also means area so I will use area. Sources http://www.yemen-nic.info/contents/Politics/reslentekha.php and http://yemenparliament.gov.ye/Details?Post=726 --SharabSalam (talk) 00:30, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Amanat Al-Asemah
 * Area 17
 * 2003:Muhammed Abdlilah Muhammed Ahmad Alqathi. (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Muhammed Hamid Yahya Al-Tawqi
 * Taiz
 * Area 33
 * 2003:Ali Abdulmu'ti Ahmad Muhammed Al-Junid (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Muhammed Ahmad Yahya Al-Junid
 * Ibb
 * Area 88
 * 2003:Abdullah Hasan Muhammed Saeed Al-Da'ees (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Ali Muhammed Salah Al-Zanam
 * Area 91
 * 2003:Muhammed Muhammed Ahmad Salah Al-Sabri (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Nashwan Muhammed Muhammed Al-Sabri
 * Area 92
 * 2003:Hasan Ali Abdullah Nashir 'Anan (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:'Ammar Hasan Ali Abdullah 'Anan
 * Area 109
 * 2003:Muhammed Naser Ghanim Sharafat Al-Himyari (Independent)
 * 2019:Ahmad Muhammed Naser Sharafat Al-Himyari
 * Al Bayda'
 * Area 124
 * 2003:Saalam Ahmed Muhammed Omar Al-Junid (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Saalam Abdullah Ahmad Musa Hidan
 * Area 131
 * 2003:Ali Ahmad Naser Muhammed Al-Dahab (National Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party)
 * 2019:Ahmad Saif Ahmad Naser Al-Dahab
 * Al Hudaydah
 * Area 166
 * 2003:Muhammed Abdullah Husain Qasirh Al-Ahdal (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Hussain Muhammed Abdullah Husain Qasirh
 * Area 177
 * 2003:Abdullah Abduh Ali Ahmad Ahiyaf (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Muhammed Abdullah Abduh Ali Ahiyaf
 * Area 182
 * 2003:Mahmoud Qyied 'Awad Salman Al-Dabsi (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Salim Mahmoud Qyied 'Awad Al-Dabsi
 * Area 188
 * 2003:Ali Muhammed Ahmad Al-khabal (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Ali Ali Muhammed Ahmad Al-khabal
 * Area 193
 * 2003:Muhammed Ali Yahya Mazriah (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Yaser Muhammed Ali Mazriah
 * Thamar
 * Area 203
 * 2003:Muhammed Ahmad Muhsin Muhammed Miqdad (Independent)
 * 2019:Muhammed Ali Abdullah Miqdad
 * Area 214
 * 2003:Muhammed Al-khadim Ahmed Galib Al-Wajeeh (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Muhammed Hammed Salim Al-Misbahi
 * Al-Mahwit
 * Area 242
 * 2003:Al-Shikh Hussin Hussin Hussin Hussin Khamis (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:'Ammar Hussin Hussin Khamis
 * Hajjah
 * Area 243
 * 2003:Yahya Hasan Yahya Hasan Nsaar (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Ahmad Yahya Hasan Nsaar
 * Area 251
 * 2003:Ahmad Muhammed Ali Al-lHarib Al-Shammari (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Mahmoud Ahmad Muhammed Al-Harib
 * Area 260
 * 2003:Muhammed Muhammed Ahmed Al-Zaroom Mamdooh (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Muhammed Muhammed Muhammed Al-Zaroom
 * Area 261
 * 2003:Ali Bin Ali Al-Tieed Hasan (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Abdulrahman Hussin Muhammed Sho'ii Al-Jama'i
 * Area 262
 * 2003:Muhammed Sabr Ali Abdullah Al-Jama'i (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Ali Muhammed Ali Abduh Abu Abdal
 * Sa'dah
 * Area 266
 * 2003:Ali Hussin Salaam Saeed Al-Munbhi (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Ali Ali Hussin Salaam
 * Area 267
 * 2003:Abdulkarim Ahmad Jadban Ali (Independent)
 * 2019:Murtada Abdulkarim Ahmad Judban
 * 'Amran
 * Area 289
 * 2003:Naji Mansour Ali Rajih Sa'ad (General People's Congress)
 * 2019:Haamed NAji Mansour Rajih

Thank you for your work. Also, did you know if Ansarullah contested to the election (without knowing if they won seats)? So, the Yemeni press does no cover the campaign? Regards. Circle=constituency. --Panam2014 (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * There is one source that I found that says this. Which is Alsharq Alawsat  it says that the houthis forced people to attend the elections and it says that even after the Houthis supported someone called Altawqi in the Amanat Alaseemah, area 17 he didnt win which (according to the source) shows that the Houthis are not welcomed in Sana'a.--SharabSalam (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Wait Al-Tawqi did win the election but the source in Alsharq Alawast says he didnt. I dont know much about this I will do some research and update later.-SharabSalam (talk) 01:20, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I have updated the vacants seats and deceased from 2015. We should now wait for the new MP. Also, did you know the current composition of Shura Council?--Panam2014 (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Thanks for your edit to User:Jumboeggplant69 14:54, 4 April 2019 (UTC) about  editing  related to a living (or recently deceased) persons, Jumboeggplant69 seems to have a problem with his/her sources ~  ie: Kirstjen Nielsen Revision as of 00:37, 8 April 2019 once again thanks ~ Mitch ~

Mitchellhobbs (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2019 (UTC) 


 * You are welcome SharabSalam (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

On the Queen of Sheba
Salam! I was just wondering, since you edited the Queen of Sheba's Arabic name on the page, whether we should use الملكة بلقيس instead of ملكة سبأ. Although "الملكة بلقيس" is her most famous name among Arabic speakers, ملكة سبأ is the more accurate translation, the page itself is called "Queen of Sheba" not "Queen Bilqis", and the Qur'an doesn't actually name her as such. It would make more sense within the article, considering the fact that the Hebrew translation also says "Queen of Sheba". Cheers! JDHaidar (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Walikom Al-Salam, See WP:COMMONNAME and MOS:FORLANG SharabSalam (talk) 10:37, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * also see the article in Arabic Wikipedia. Its name is Balqis which proves that this is a commonly used name in the Arab world and we don't use translation in the lead but the most common name. SharabSalam (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Better image: https://fineartamerica.com/featured/queen-of-sheba-edward-slocombe.html Please, can you edit it? Thank you! --87.4.239.175 09:55, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, this image is not free from copyright so I can't upload it to Wikipedia and we can't use it in Wikipedia without uploading it.--SharabSalam (talk) 12:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Then can you upload the same image from another site that it's not copyright? --87.15.51.26 13:43, 16 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.15.51.26 (talk)
 * It's not about the site. The image belongs to someone who has chosen not to make it under free copyright licence.--SharabSalam (talk) 14:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Kleuske (talk) 18:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

drone strikes
Hello. I added sources, removed unsourced. read it again. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masgouf (talk • contribs) 17:20, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ohhh I am so sorry. I got a notification that I was reverted but I didn't notice that you added sources while reverting. Please next time write in the edit summary that you have added source. Thanks-SharabSalam (talk) 17:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Yemeni politicians
Hi

I think we should create article about more politicians, ministers, soldiers, officials, MP. Also, it could be good to convice others Yemenis to join WP. Also, do you have photos from Yemeni ministers, buildings, presidency, etc? Or Saleh al Sammad cemetary? --Panam2014 (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, to be honest with you I am not in Yemen. I am a Yemeni citizen I have a Yemeni citizenship but I don't live in Yemen since October 2017. I have got wounded and I am getting treated in another country. I have old photos from Yemen that were stored in my memory card and most of them are old and because I lived most of my life in a village I don't have many photos of cities and buildings. I have tried to create articles about Yemeni politicans but I couldn't find many sources in English. I was trying to make articles about Ali Al-Bukhaiti (علي البخيتي) and his brother Muhammad Al-Bukhaiti (محمد البخيتي). Ali Al-Bukhaiti is so pro-Saudi led coalition and is like a very famous politican in Yemen while Muhammad Al-Bukhaiti is the spokesman of the Houthis who is also so famous and has met with Abdul-Malik Al-Houthi many times. He is like a leader of Houthis who also fought in the war of Hudyadiah.--SharabSalam (talk) 02:56, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

In WP we could create article with arabic sources if the text is in English. OK. --Panam2014 (talk) 12:04, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Assalamualaikum
Assalamualaikum/Wah Salah Lu Mai Kong. 2001:D08:2184:F5F1:1:0:F25:252B (talk) 08:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Walikomasalam, I didn't understand what you said. I can only speak English and Arabic, sorry.--SharabSalam (talk) 12:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mandi (food), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mandi_%28food%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mandi_%28food%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made&#32;to Ramadan: you may already know about them, but you might find Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Sincerely,    Masum Reza ☎  09:29, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

A help regarding page wakil Kumar Yadav
Hi I have edited a new page named Wakil Kumar Yadav. I have given renowned sources as reference. But someone has reported as deleting page. Plz visit the page Wakil Kumar Yadav and approve it's as if reference are according to Wikipedia guidelines. Wakuxyz (talk) 08:13, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Iran
Why did you continue the edit war without trying to gain consensus for your changes, first? Why are you not observing the bold, revert, discuss cycle? Why should your version be up while the dispute is ongoing if it doesn't represent the status quo ante? El_C 16:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * we have both agreed that it needs wording that's consensus?--SharabSalam (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, maybe not a straight up revert, but I do see your editorial-claim edit as highly problematic and almost certain to reignite the edit war. We should be publishing what mainstream reliable sources say, and as I said elsewhere, the Islamic regime is not a reliable source. El_C 16:44, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * BTW, I was discussing the dispute while the version I don't agree with was up. Until two other uninvolved editors came and started the edit war.--SharabSalam (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * To the best of my knowledge that version is not the status quo ante. Anyway, saying "accused of" seems like scarcely a compromise. Our Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran article should guide you two as to what's ought to be said in the main Iran article. It's too high-profile for another full protection to be the course of action I am likely to take if the edit war begins again in force. So maybe work on that lower-profile, more specialized article for a while while leaving the main Iran article in relative peace. Otherwise, perhaps it would be better if you were to propose your changes on the Talk page before submitting them, because the time for being bold is probably past. El_C 16:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Saudi Arabia
Why do you revert changes that are unrelated to the ones you're explicitly objecting to? M  .   M  01:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , because the source says interpretation not implementation yet you added that as your opinion https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2015/08/the-death-penalty-in-saudi-arabia-facts-and-figures . Not reading the source and having a POV is a bad edit faith. Also I can't load the editor right now due to internet connection issues so I just reverted--SharabSalam (talk) 01:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've left it as "interpretation" for now; please don't revert the other changes again. But I do think we need to discuss this issue on the talk page as most sources use "implementation". M   .   M  01:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * it was you who should have gone to the talk page per WP:BRD. The source next to it says interpretation not implementation. You failed to bring any source.--SharabSalam (talk) 02:00, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I was mainly referring to the sources that are used in the article (Legal system of Saudi Arabia) that the sentence wiki-linked to. Anyway, I'm going offline now, but I'll leave it as "interpertation" until we've reached talk page consensus (hopefully some time tomorrow). M   .   M  02:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , Which says that the interpretation is called Wahhabism. Which is something far from actual Islam. So yea you didn't read the source and yet have the courage to revert --SharabSalam (talk) 02:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Ben Shapiro Page
Hello, okay, I am just trying to learn what the rules are and I sincerely appreciate the advice. I added a quote Obama said to his page and someone removed it as they said not every gaffe needs to be mentioned. So I followed that principle and removed a gaffe from Ben Shapiro's page to which people seem to say that is not okay. It seems the rules are only enforced on one side Dy3o2 (talk) 05:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , things that got significant coverage are worth inclusion in Wikipedia. Read this WP:SIGCOV.--SharabSalam (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the information, I do appreciate it.Dy3o2 (talk) 05:19, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Battle of Najran
Hi Do you have sources about it? --Panam2014 (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * In English? There is this source https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/06/yemen-houthis-claim-seizing-20-positions-saudi-arabia-190606030429810.html
 * In Arabic only pro-Houthi sources are covering this.
 * Are you thinking of creating an article about it?. Doesn't seem notable yet.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Are you thinking of creating an article about it?. Doesn't seem notable yet.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

ANI
Your comment here is not helpful. Oshwah was in the process of diffusing the situation. Your comment inflames it and also demonstrates what others have been trying to tell you: You do not have enough experience to be taking part in ANI. An IBAN is wholly inappropriate in this situation and does nothing to resolve the conflict. Oshwah's suggestion was the most appropriate response. I know it is hard to hear that one doesn't have enough experience for ANI. It was said to me. My action was disruptive, and the admins would be totally justified in sanctioning me if I continue. Your participation borders on being disruptive, and you should heed the advice that others gave you to disengage. Editing Wikipedia articles is a good hobby to fill time. Editing ANI to fill time is not. TelosCricket (talk) 16:25, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , I know Forest see his talk page. I have tried to give him advices in the past. I am not even commenting randomly the ANI anymore. It's just that I know Forest90 and I wanted to say that. I should not comment in an ANI ever??!!-SharabSalam (talk) 16:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Honestly, no, probably not. Not unless you need to file a complaint or respond to a complaint made against you. We should both stay off it. TelosCricket (talk) 16:41, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Request for my new Article
Hi SharabSalam. I have just finished my new Article, Gunman attack in Tripoli 2019, can you review the Article and help me to find a better title for it? (or my Article title is suitable). Thank you.Forest90 (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
 * the title looks fine. I will look at it again when I am free. Thanks.--SharabSalam (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Your Laki question
If your still interested in your question regarding Laki, I can answer that. The way Glottolog classifies Laki-Kurdish as some kind of parent group for all the Kurdish dialects, is not a widespread agreed classification (and not something I've seen elsewhere). It's more common to put Laki as the fourth Kurdish dialect or as a sub-dialect of Southern Kurdish. Linguist Anonby (who has written many articles on Laki) writes: "Most linguists classify Laki within Kurdish, although it is unclear whether it is best classified as a separate of branch Kurdish (as shown here) or as a variety of Southern Kurdish. Still, some speakers of Laki and many Northern Lori speakers consider it part of the Lori group." --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 12:21, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I didn't know that.--SharabSalam (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Deletion appeal
You closed my discussion on |Talk:June 2019 Gulf of Oman incident only a few minutes after I posted it. I was not making legal threats (WP:THREAT) to anyone by saying they're "suspect." I meant they're probably writing with bias. WP:NOTAFORUM does not apply in this case, because the talk page is in fact a forum, and I did not make any changes to the article. I was also in midst of writing some advice based on Wikipedia policy on impartiality (WP:IMPARTIAL). I will appeal for this deletion. —Partytemple (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You said this
 * Who are you referring to there? Other editors, right? And you are saying they are suspect which means they are accused of a crime. That sounds like a serious threat to me. It is also unpleasant to say that in the talk page.
 * I understand that you are still new in this website. You probably think this website is similar to Twitter, Facebook and blogs etc. No, even talk pages are not forums and we should only discuss things that are related to the article without original thoughts or research.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * "Suspect" is used with a variety of definitions in English.


 * suspect (adj.): not able to be trusted; possibly false or dangerous.


 * Nothing in there implies a crime, nor did I make legal threats. Stop misconstruing what I said and my intentions. I was also in the middle of writing some Wikipedia policy advice to further the discussion. You removed it before any discussion even took place. And the talk page is in fact a forum. I was discussing WP:IMPARTIAL and will re-post my thoughts accordingly. —Partytemple (talk) 21:30, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * that definition doesn't make what you said look good. It makes it worse. Saying that an editor is "dangerous or not able to be trusted" is a personal attack regardless of your motivation. Anyway, you do what you want. I am pretty sure other editors would not allow you to continue that discussion.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:CLOSE. You're not allowed to close a discussion before a discussion even took place. Again, stop misconstruing my words. I did not accuse anyone of a crime. And "making myself look bad" isn't a reason to close the discussion. I will inform an administrator if this continues. —Partytemple (talk) 21:45, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Move

 * I am with you in the moving, you should read the article to consider that they just try to say that Al-Aqsa Mosque is just of the silver dome. الرشيد (talk) 01:01, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Block
Please notice that I am not editwarring only two reverts in this day. The article is in the version that I didn't prefer. The editor doesn't reply except after too much time.--SharabSalam (talk) 20:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Question., I was always under the impression that administrative warnings would be repeated on the user's talk page. Is this not the case? &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 20:39, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * That is not the case. And reverting, period, constituted edit warring, at this point. Otherwise, I am having a difficult time following this unblock request. It was this user who opened the report, where they and the other user were both warned. Since both users continued edit warring after that warning, they were both blocked for varying duration. Obviously, the user/s would have preferred protection over a block, but I opted to go with blocks nonetheless. El_C 20:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah, so it's a classic "the Wrong Version"-scenario. Well thank you for answering the question. Sorry I can't say anything helpful here, SharabSalam. :/ &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 20:47, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (Edit conflict)I didn't even get ping notification I forgot about the report. I went to discuss this issue in the article talk page but then the user disappear. He is not active. Also I want that the block be removed from AliSami because I am still waiting for his response in the talk page so even if I got unblocked I would wait 60 hour for him to respose and then I don't know how much time I would have to wait until he opens Wikipedia and respose. This block is just a punishment and unproductive. We are discussing the dispute. I wanted a page protection to the status que version not block!! Lol. I fail to understand how the block has solved the problem since I am not reverting and the page is stable. Please look see the history of the page .--SharabSalam (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * We can't account for one's recollection or intention. The page history confirms that edit warring resumed after a warning was issued to both users. El_C 20:53, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * which warning? I didn't get a notification when EdJohnston made that comment. He didn't ping me. I never received any warning about editwarring in my talk page. Yes after I replied in the talk page to AliSami. AliSami never replied to me. I waited while his version is applied. I then reverted because the reason he gave in the talk page was original research and he delayed too much while replying. After two days he came back and reverted me. I reverted one time saying that he should seek consensus because he is the one who made the first bold edit and per WP:BRD circle he should seek consensus not me. I reverted one more time and then I left when he replied in the talk page but again he disappeared.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:00, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I realize this is your own talk page, but can you please stop refactoring while I, at least, am being pinged? Anyway, BRD is not mandatory and you should not be edit warring regardless, especially after a warning. As mentioned, you were the one who opened the first AN3 report, so the onus is on you to follow up with its result. Not sure why you continue failing to take responsibility for that. El_C 21:07, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't follow the report result because of this Special:Diff/901809385 AliSami started a discussion something he didn't do before the report. I predicted the result of the report. I thought the result will be both editors have stopped editwarring and they are discussing the issue in the talk page the reply of EdJohnston was after AliSami comment and very late the notice board isn't in my watchlist. But then the response in the talk page showed me that AliSami is still new in Wikipedia and that he doesn't know that original research isn't acceptable. I replied to him then waited for too long to see his response. I reverted to the status que version and asked for page protection but it was declined because the article was stable. After two days from my revert he came back and started editwarring I reverted him twice and asked for page protection but didn't receive any response. I went to the editwarring notice board and asked there for page protection so that AliSami start replying in the talk page instead of just editwarring.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:18, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Look, if you're gonna keep refactoring, I'm just not going to respond any longer. Anyway, this is becoming circular. Again, you are expected the be responsible for your own reports — this includes but is not limited to their conclusions. Not sure I see how protecting the article on your opponent's version is supposed to motivate him to be more collaborative. El_C 21:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

it will force him to reply in the talk page instead of disappearing. Now that you have blocked me and blocked him and actually blocked the process of solving the dispute in the talk page, how much can you guarantee that AliSami who has made 44 edits per 2 years is going to respond in the talk page?? What if he left Wikipedia after getting blocked? What should I do? Should I wait for his response for one weeks after his block and my block expire then revert him because I got no response? What if he came back and reverted me? I will be indeff block, right? Because I returned to revert after the block was removed.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * It takes at least two to edit war. If he does not respond after, say, a week, you'll be free to revert back to your version. El_C 21:45, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Alright,, how about you unblock me and AliSami, both of us, I will wait for one week for his response. In any case I was waiting for his response even though he made the first bold edit. Wouldn't that be a better idea than blocking us both?. As I said I wasn't aware of any warning. I have a lot of other things I want to edit other than Houthi movement article. The block is not productive or preventive.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * You were already unblocked once before after an edit warring block, so I, myself, am not inclined to unblock (either of) you at this time. El_C 21:56, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Yea that was a long time ago.. I don't think we should reference that past. The argument is that I am not going to revert for one or two weeks if AliSami didn't respond. I will also ask for AliSami to be unblocked so that he can respose or I will be discussing the dispute with him in his own talk page.--SharabSalam (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I feel that there should be a component of deterrence to a block, and that prior blocks ought to be taken into account. So, I still decline. But you have an unblock request up (one which I consider subpar — but that's besides the point), so another admin may or may not grant that request. El_C 22:05, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * SharabSalam, a person like yourself who files reports at WP:AN3 is assumed to be aware of the edit warring policy. So a dedicated notice of 3RR on your talk page is not required.
 * The page at Houthi movement has been reported twice by you at AN3. It does not seem reasonable that you would be unaware of the closure of a report that you yourself filed. For you to continue warring on 15 June when you had been warned on 14 June does not suggest a cautious approach to a troubled situation. Repeated filing at AN3 is not a substitute for reaching consensus with others. If your negotiation appears to make no progress, you should stop reverting no matter how long it takes. There are ways of getting assistance with a dispute that don't risk getting a block. EdJohnston (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * sorry for the ping. I am aware of the 3RR. I haven't breach it, it says more than 3 reverts per 24 hours. I will repeat: I left the first report in AN3 when AliSami started a discussion in the talk page of the Houthis. But then after AliSami disappeared from the discussion and his argument in the talk page was original research. I revert after I waited for long time. two days later he came back and reverted me and I reverted him twice. He is the one who started the bold edit BTW and he asks me to go to the talk page to seek consensus. I did reply to him and I was waiting either for his response or the page protection. I didn't ask for blocking him and I wasn't aware of any  warning.--SharabSalam (talk) 22:41, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * And BTW if I knew there was a warning I would have been more careful while reverting. The warning isn't like knowing what the policy is.--SharabSalam (talk) 22:46, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Interesting, how would I know that the IP who just reviewed my unblock request is actually ?--SharabSalam (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm looking into that. El_C 22:58, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think we should just undo what the IP did since it is not clear whether he is an admin or not because that make me lose chances that another editor will incline the request for the unblock. Also I don't think he was unaware he was logged out, how did he sign his comment while not knowing that he is logged out?? --SharabSalam (talk) 23:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Could you please protect this talk page. The IP doesn't seem to be him.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * In case there's any lingering confusion, those IP edits were not made by me. I don't generally handle 3RR-related blocks or unblocks (and will abstain here as well). Another administrator should feel free to review this request. Goodnight mush Talk 01:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries, In any case, I don't think that admins are allowed to make admin actions while logged out.--SharabSalam (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, . I am so sorry for the ping. I want to say that I am not going to revert any edit in that article except after I wait for 2 weeks for AliSami response and if we get to impasse I will use RfC or 3O. I want to say that I really have a lot of free time especially this day and other days forward and I have got nothing entertaining and fun to do except to edit in this platform. I have a lot of articles that I want to expand like Yemeni districts, Yemeni food, Yemeni cities etc during this time I will not touch the article of Houthis. Further more, I will not make any revert in any article for 1 week –just like the duration of this block– even if it was reverting vandalism. I know you can unblock me. I will keep my word. In short, The block is preventing me from doing productive edits for this project not from harming the project.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:35, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the unblock
Thanks. I am totally responsible for the block and I will not do it again.--SharabSalam (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome back, — Paleo Neonate  – 18:02, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, PaleoNeonate.--SharabSalam (talk) 21:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

You have mail!
Check my talk page. *Muwah*  « l | Promethean | l »   (talk) 10:25, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jazirat Ziadi
Hello, SharabSalam,

Thanks for creating Jazirat Ziadi! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:01, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Help me to solve my Article problem
Hi my friend. I have just finished my new Article, July 2019 Ethiopian Jews protest in Israel. Can you help me to solve its problems, if you like. thank you so much.Forest90 (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Yea, I saw it before you sent me this. I will try to help. Thank you so much for creating that article.--SharabSalam (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * first notice, I saw a lot of plagiarism. I know it is hard for non-English speakers (me, for example) to use their own vocabularies but try to be creative as much as possible.--SharabSalam (talk) 17:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I nominated my new Article for in the news section and one user commented, Weak oppose, and I want to solve the problems. Maybe I solve the Article problems and could change this user comment and finally publish my Article in in the news section.Forest90 (talk) 07:05, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I have got no idea how nominating for news works. I haven't been in that area before. I will try to improve the article while I am free.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/You Know Me Movement
Yikes, just saw in the history that I'd accidentally knocked out two edits when I left my comment. Thanks for the fix! GorillaWarfare (talk) 23:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
 * You are welcome. (I just noticed this comment)--SharabSalam (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry
I am very sorry for attacking you and I'm sorry for ignoring for reasoning for your edits. I am also very sorry for being really biased on the War on Terror and the Yemeni conflict. I messed up and that should not have happened if I were to accept your reasoning on your edits. I hope anything like this will never happened again. Again I apologize for my recent actions. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 01:34, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:44, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

I saw your comment about killing time on the ANI
Most of my family is fasting now as well so I sympathize. I will wish you Eid Mubarak in advance of tomorrow. User:Lightburst 20:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , so what happened at the end of that report? Honestly, I was very emotional at that time and I felt that you were trying to harass that editor which is something that triggers me. BTW I just saw your comment. My notifications were crowded at that time so I just ignored all the notifications.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, Welcome back. Nothing happened. I guess it was all too confused with too many options. An admin closed it and said it was a mess. I won't be going back to ANI again. I hope you are well. Lightburst (talk) 19:01, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Ken Coar page
I *am* Ken Coar, and @theRoUS *is* my main Twitter account. Would you please revert your edit that removed it?

Thanks.. Rodent of Unusual Size (talk) 07:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Coar - I'm going to step in on this discussion here and explain a few policies and guidelines, and set some expectations with you regarding those policies. Because you claim to be Ken Coar (the article subject), this means that you have a conflict of interest regarding this article because it's about you. Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines expect all editors who have such conflicts of interest to completely refrain from editing those articles, participating in discussions that involve them, or even messaging users in a way that implies ownership of the article and its content. You need to edit and participate on this project as if the Ken Coar article doesn't exist, and you need to focus on other articles, topics, and areas within Wikipedia.


 * Users and editors cannot use your claims of being Ken Coar as a reason to modify the article or change its content if no reliable source exists to support or verify what's being changed. Users and editors have absolutely no ownership of articles or content on Wikipedia. All editors have the same exact "rank" or "right" to edit an article and its content as everyone else (assuming the compliance of all Wikipedia's policies and guidelines); there are no pages, areas, situations, or processes that exist where an editor has more "exclusivity" to edit an article than anyone else.


 * I wanted to respond here and talk to you about these policies and guidelines because your message appeared to use your claim of being the article subject as a sufficient "source" or reason to ask another editor to undo or implement an edit or change. This behavior is not viewed as acceptable by the community, nor do any claims of being the article subject have true merit (due to the fact that such claims cannot be explicitly proven). If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to message me on my user talk page and I'll be happy to help you.


 * Please review the policies and guidelines that I've listed for you here, and make sure that you understand them and that your edits and your conduct comply with them at all times. Thank you for understanding, and for helping the project to grow and be accessible to everyone in the world. Best regards -  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   08:19, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Oshwah, I can't add anything more to what you said.
 * Thanks User:Coar, I am so sorry that I am unable to undo my edit. I can't verify the Twitter account. I hope you understand.--SharabSalam (talk) 10:54, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * SharabSalam No problem; I wasn't thinking about the issue of Twitter verification. Oshwah, Thanks for your guidance. I do have questions, but SharabSalam's page isn't the place. :-) I'll ask you on my own user talk page, since it is I who need to keep the rules clear, and your page will be off my radar.  Please check User coar talk?  Thanks!  —Preceding undated comment added 02:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * @SharabSalam A verified account on Twitter is "verified". That means you don't have to verify the account twice. . Masum Reza 📞 03:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It is not verified in Twitter. I am not familiar with Twitter but I think you get a ☑ mark next to the account name if it's verified. It's name is not "Ken Coar" and the photo of the account is not Coar's photo. When I deleted the link, I thought that there was someone trying to advertise his Twitter account in Wikipedia and he is not the real Ken Coar. If you think it is fine to add that Twitter account then add it, I have no problem. I actually want to add it but I am not sure it's his real account. I would be very sorry if it was his real account.--SharabSalam (talk) 03:56, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at 5G. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:39, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * WTF Why? I didn't make more than 3 reverts and I wrote edit summary. Please investigate the issue more.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't block you for violating 3RR. I blocked you for edit-warring, which is precisely what you did. Indeed, your third revert was after you were warned. Also, your removal of your report at ANEW was clearly disruptive.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Your block was fast and we were discussing this issue in the talk page. You made an unfair block for both of us but it is not that easy for an admin to admit that. I withdrew my report because we were discussing this.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Since I can't reply due the block in that discussion. I want to tell that he reverted not to the status que version because the other editor has changed the content of that paragraph revert to an older version please so that the RFC don't change.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:54, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
 * SharabSalam, if you file a report on a noticeboard, you can "withdraw" the complaint but you should never delete it, even if it is resolved. It's important that complaints be archived so that admins can see if there is a history of disruptive behavior, by any editor involved. A 48 hour block is a short block so I encourage you to wait it out and not edit war again in the future. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:09, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * okay, I didn't know how to withdraw my report. I wanted to withdraw it. Why are you so fast going to block us given the fact that we were discussing this in the talk page. Bbb23 didn't look closer to the issue. He blocked us immediately. I can't believe that he looked at the history page and to the discussion pages in that small amount of time. Also, I just opened Wikipedia and saw that there was an editwar happening in that article. I believe that the paragraph should be deleted because the ongoing RfC is saying "Should the paragraph be included?" not "Should the paragraph be removed?" There have been a lot of editwarring in that article. The other editor was reverting every removal of that paragraph since he added it and he is the one who started the RfC.--SharabSalam (talk) 00:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Also I feel like my voice is not heard in that discussion. and, could you see this edit Special:Diff/905863726. This editor is claiming that he has reverted to the status que version but it is not the status que version. I hope you respond to that.--SharabSalam (talk) 00:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Help me!
Hi, I was wondering. Can I copy paste a long poem to an article? Like the poem is related to the article and it is needed in the article. Can I do that? ThanksSharabSalam (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the poem? Is it subject to copyright? Praxidicae (talk) 16:20, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikisource would like your poem if it is public domain. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 16:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * this poem, that starts with "We purchased sleep, when tendons in the neck were drawn". I don't think this book is in public domain. The poem is from "pre-Islamic" time. However, the translation to English was published in 1999. I want to improve this article. I made a mistake once upon time and copy pasted a lot of copyright content to that article. I had no idea what copyright means. now, I am trying to add his death story and I was wondering if I am able to quote that long poem in the article.--SharabSalam (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * [Thank you for the ping] Yeah, the book is copyrighted material because the author's translation are separately copyrighted from the source material. What you can do is, if you find a transcription of the poem in Arabic, upload that to Wikisource and translate it yourself. Otherwise, you aren't going to have much luck getting it posted anywhere, I'm afraid. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 17:10, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I guess the poem isn't that much important. I have another question, how much text can I quote from copyrighted material?-SharabSalam (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * That's subjective. WP:Close paraphrasing might be worth a read, but I'm not the expert there. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 23:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Unrelated note: I've been noticing an uptick in POV-pushing for Assyrian-related articles. Please be on the lookout for any unsourced changes regarding that and related ethnic groups. &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 23:08, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure. I don't have much knowledge about that subject. I am interested in two or three sections in that article. All I can do is to revert obvious POV pushing. Also, I will try to check whether the sources support the cited text.--SharabSalam (talk) 23:18, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Protection templates
Hello SharabSalam. Please see this page. Happy editing. Puduḫepa 09:29, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I thought that the protection was extended confirmed protect.--SharabSalam (talk) 10:01, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

About Administrators%27_noticeboard
See Perennial_proposals. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , Thank you. Through your link I found this Village pump (proposals)/Archive 70 which I think was a good proposal. I will try proposing a similar idea but with more solution. Currently, I don't have the ability to do this. I am not busy but it's hard to do all of this in my phone and my laptop is having technical issues so maybe I will do it later..--SharabSalam (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Other wikis have tried this. The problem is that when admins step in to police problems on controversial topics, they get enemies. In many cases an good and fair admin will get enemies from both sides of the fight. Those enemies then show up to vote against the admin. Result: Admins stop dealing with controversial topics, and those topics turn into uncontrolled warzones. Alsee (talk) 20:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Warning
You seemed to be involved in an edit … wait a moment, that is the outcome I wanted, Cheers! Now I suspect you of being my sock puppet, because you are correct in your assessment: bare terms give undue weight to facts that need sentences and context. cygnis insignis 11:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Houthi movement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Takinginterest01 (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Warning
you have made a revert on an article (Houthi movement) that restricts more than one revert per 24 hours, which can result in blocks and sanctions, thank you for contributions and have a nice day. Takinginterest01 (talk) 07:02, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You still haven't explained why you reverted SharabSalam?  &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:03, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * That page isn't under WP:DS though? { &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

-- SharabSalam, you have, indeed, violated 1RR, so please take the opportunity to self-revert. El_C 07:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * the Houthi movement isn't under any sanction and you should explain your edits. Making claims even by the US as if they are true isn't acceptable.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:07, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Wait, but they were until you removed them? { &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 07:10, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * An IP added that without any explanation I reverted. I don't think the article is under a sanction.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello hope all is well! No explanation is needed, and your confrontational stance is rather concerning and potentially disruptive, as well as the bias you are potentially tying to push (i.e " Reverted 1 edit by Takinginterest01 (talk): Revert ( poisoning the well.) the US regime is in support of the Saudis not the Yemen." and "Reverted 1 edit by Takinginterest01: Not neutral. rewrite this while pointing out that these are claims made by the US or the Saudis etc. Don't put claims in Wikivoice.") It is not an obligation to provided an explanation nor is it a duty, but rather it is a courtesy. Thank you! Takinginterest01 (talk) 07:13, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Xaosflux added SCW General sanctions by creating Template:Editnotices/Page/Houthi movement. El_C 07:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Didn't know that sorry.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , Yes. The US is part of the war against Yemen so any claim should be attributed to the US or the Saudis. Like an Iranian boat was seized that was delivering bluh bluh and all that BS.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I am sorry you are not satisfied with verified facts, from objective and reliable sources that you can read for yourself as they have been cited. This is the nature of wikipedia and its encyclopedic nature, it is regrettable you find it to be "BS" and "bluh bluh" however this is factual information that is essential to be known and only serves in contribution to academic fields and study on the subject in a clear lens with as much information as possible. The source provided does not specify who's claim is who's but rather it states a Ship was seized, otherwise there would be no basis proving it is an "American" or "Saudi" claim other than personal suspicions which in themselves are biased, or original research which is not welcome here in wikipedia, thank you!

Takinginterest01 (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * US based sources are not reliable. Currently I don't have time for this, will discuss this in the article later. these are surely not facts nor verified but rather propaganda by the US regime which seeks to destroy Yemen.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Please leave your personal bias off of wikipedia, this sort of behavior is not welcome or encouraged, edits you conduct removing sourced material from reliable sources (regardless of what you consider reliable) will be reverted and seen as vandalism. For further information please read Vandalism, Reliable sources, and Neutral point of view. As stated continued disruptive behavior (which includes emotionally, politically, philosophically or anything else bias) is not welcome on wikipedia and can lead to blocks, sanctions and ultimately bans from the site itself, please take great care in your use of wikipedia and the edits you make, and please help to preserve the neutral nature of this site, so it can remain as a non-bias objective source, for people to be free to make their own opinion from their own independent research, thanks.Takinginterest01 (talk) 07:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Revert
Your revert and edit summary here are incorrect. Per policy, there is nothing at all preventing that IP from blanking their talk page as they did.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, SharabSalam. This note is just to say that you needn't worry about evidence of my putative admin abuse; it's not gone just because it has been blanked. Everything anybody has done on the page remains in the page history. Bishonen &#124; talk 21:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC).

You're not an administrator
So kindly stop acting like one and posting warnings intended for yourself on my talk page, thanks and best regards.Takinginterest01 (talk) 03:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * You are welcome!. I thought I was being nice when I gave you the news.--SharabSalam (talk) 03:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Iranian politics general sanctions notice

 * , So you copy-paste this message without attribution? Did you write it yourself? Please provide details about what template you used to post this notice. Thank you.--SharabSalam (talk) 02:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 😂 So you did write it yourself! Sorry! I wanted to know where you got this notice from because I will be using it a lot. There is who is still not notified.--SharabSalam (talk) 02:38, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It should end with something like " " but it doesn't.--SharabSalam (talk) 02:59, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , has been added. --MrClog (talk) 22:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Backlog Banzai
In the month of September, Wikiproject Military history is running a project-wide edit-a-thon, Backlog Banzai. There are heaps of different areas you can work on, for which you claim points, and at the end of the month all sorts of whiz-bang awards will be handed out. Every player wins a prize! There is even a bit of friendly competition built in for those that like that sort of thing. Sign up now at WikiProject Military history/September 2019 Backlog Banzai to take part. For the coordinators, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:18, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Mauritius Tamils
Mauritius Tamils consider themselves as "Tamil" only and they consider "Hindu" to be the term for North Indians. I don't think other Indian ethnic groups consider themselves to be a separate ethnic group. Thus it is worth mentioning. If you believe the reference is not from a reliable source then I can add other references such as from Google Books. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=rlJWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA211&lpg=PA211&dq=Mauritian+Tamils&source=bl&ots=FLTHHp5Drz&sig=ACfU3U2Jws0o8PqC0-QpXN9p3OTanARa1A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi2hbv9oJbkAhVEuI8KHUJoC5o4ChDoATADegQIBhAB#v=onepage&q=Tamil&f=false --M.K.Dan (talk) 10:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Tucker Carlson
Please see talk if you would like to comment about the lead section. --Malerooster (talk) 16:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Unexplained Edit
That is bizarre. I definitely did not make that edit and I am glad you reverted the change. I have only made one edit from this IP address without logging in under my account and it wasn't to that article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.167.147.21 (talk) 23:10, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem.--SharabSalam (talk) 12:21, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Salam
Akhi, I was expanding the antiquity page of Mogadishu. The phone reference you were talking about. I did not add that. It was already there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesacrick (talk • contribs) 04:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * the content you added is obviously not a neutral point of view. See what you did you removed this
 * And replace it with this weakly sourced content without providing a reason for that.--SharabSalam (talk) 04:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Place discuss the problem with the current version first in the talk page per WP:BRD and seek consensus--SharabSalam (talk) 04:55, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I was planning to expand the antiquity page. My bad for removing that. I was going to make another section for that but realized what you were clashing. I added it back. Next time I will not remove then come back and then bring it back in another antiquity section. I was rushing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesacrick (talk • contribs) 04:58, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
 * before you do anything go to the talk page and explain why you want to change or remove some sourced content from that page because you can't make bold edits like that. Also "Muqdisho is so old than west Asia to be influenced by" please source this to relevent source that talks about Muqdisho name and avoid original research, thanks.--SharabSalam (talk) 05:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

That is what older reverts say and if you look at the page. It says the same thing but I understand where you coming from. Thanks for the advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesacrick (talk • contribs) 05:07, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Look, brother. I want a dialogue. I don't understand why you are being so rude when I am being very open. You need to stop this edit wars. If you disagree then focus on a specific edit, not revert the whole page. That is not allowed in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lesacrick (talk • contribs) 07:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Yemen
Please stop edit warring. Subscribe to WP:BRD. Thanks. El_C 08:43, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * , I didn't get any notification of your reverts and your reverts arent tagged as undo. Will open a discussion soon.--SharabSalam (talk) 08:48, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I already have. I self-reverted, even though you and the IP are adding incorrect information. El_C 08:50, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * I studied the area of Yemen in school. They told us it is 555,000 km2. when I did some research right now. I find conflicting sources.--SharabSalam (talk) 08:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * We go with what is current, not historical. Your 2002 sources are basically that. El_C 08:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * There hasn't been any change in the area of Yemen since 1990.--SharabSalam (talk) 09:01, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Geography_of_Yemen. El_C 09:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Alright, I have reverted. I will investigate this more.--SharabSalam (talk) 09:16, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Al Muhadhar brigade
Hi Do you have information about this brigade? And about Saleh's Gardians of the Republic? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)


 * , What information do you want about them? they aren't very well known. It is called al-Mihdhar brigade. It is now the 3rd Infantry Brigade. Its leader is brigadier Bassam al-Mihdhar.--SharabSalam (talk) 07:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

You know that
Israel is Palestinian?--The Anonymous Sasson Map 1.5 (talk) 09:31, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , stop vandalising Wikipedia. This is not a battle field.--SharabSalam (talk) 09:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Gabbard hatnote
Would it be ok to use a or  or other mechanism to direct to that page in the lead? Humanengr (talk) 17:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. The article is notable because it is about Tulsi Gabbards' biography not because of her political position. There is a section in her article called “Political positions” and there is the main template there so... no need for the hatnotes you are proposing.--SharabSalam (talk) 17:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)


 * I'll move some from the lede back down below. Humanengr (talk) 18:04, 7 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Done. Does that work for you? Humanengr (talk) 18:07, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * , if you are talking about the long lead template, you can remove the template any time there are four or less than four paragraphs in the lead. More than four paragraphs is considered too long.-SharabSalam (talk) 18:13, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Just didn't know the protocol — whether only the placer had authority to remove. Thx. Humanengr (talk) 18:17, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem. You can remove the template any time you solve the issue. Regarding your question about Google you can ask in Village pump (technical). They will help you there.SharabSalam (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Check Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
Please check Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. You Persian (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm You Persian. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. You Persian (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. You Persian (talk) 14:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I feel sorry for you.--SharabSalam (talk) 14:16, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
 * feel sorry for me? It is you who support the Islamic Republic of Iran to killing Iranian children and women, not me. You Persian (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2019 (UTC)