User talk:Sharan Shias

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raihan Merchant (August 6)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raihan Merchant and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raihan Merchant, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raihan_Merchant Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Raihan_Merchant reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:41, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello Harishassan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Raihan Merchant, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Harishassan. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Dear Curb Safe Charmer,
 * Please let me tell you that I am not being compensated in any way for this article. This article is on a well-known person who I happen to know some things about.
 * I am flattered that you think this looks like a paid-for article. This is my first article on Wikipedia, and I wanted to get it up so I can continue adding to this resource that I use so frequently.
 * I would be delighted to have my first Wikipedia article approved.
 * Many thanks,
 * Haris


 * ==Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion==

There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brainchild communications


A tag has been placed on Brainchild communications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Largoplazo (talk) 07:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, Sharan Shias, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 03:44, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Concerns after reviewing Raihan Merchant under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process
I reviewed this under under Wikipedia's new article curation / review process. This process primarily reviews whether or not it should continue as an article. The primary question is whether or not the topic fulfills wp:notability. I believe that it does and am passing it.

Once concern is that that you are obviously wiki-experienced but created this article in one large paste while having only 2 lifetime edits under that user name. Also the article reads like a resume rather than an article about a person. This raises concerns of undisclosed WP:COI editing. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Faizan Syed for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faizan Syed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faizan Syed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 07:06, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Raihan Merchant for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raihan Merchant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Raihan Merchant until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Störm  (talk)  14:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)