User talk:Sharedaccounts123

December 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abiy Ahmed has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abiy Ahmed was changed by Sharedaccounts123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894486 on 2020-12-29T15:37:44+00:00

January 2021
Hello, I'm Silikonz. I noticed that in this edit to Abiy Ahmed, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Silikonz  ( 💬 &#124;  🖋 ) 00:47, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abiy Ahmed, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Silikonz  ( 💬 &#124;  🖋 ) 00:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

May I ask you to first work as a true Wikipedian for a year and produce articles. Then, maybe, you may think of deleting the work of others Rastakwere (talk) 13:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page October 2019 Ethiopian clashes has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits.   Elizium23 (talk) 11:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Abiy Ahmed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Elizium23 (talk) 23:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Abiy Ahmed. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. —  Newslinger  talk   08:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Sharedaccounts123, please take some time to review the simplified ruleset, which outlines the expectations for editing on Wikipedia. After your block expires, please discuss your proposed changes on the respective talk pages (Talk:Abiy Ahmed and Talk:October 2019 Ethiopian clashes) instead of reinstating them repeatedly. —  Newslinger  talk   08:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I noticed that in this edit to Abiy Ahmed, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:16, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Abiy Ahmed, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:52, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Your edit summary "correcting POV change" does not have any information on why you are removing sourced information. You should take it to the article's talk page for discussion and consensus. LizardJr8 (talk) 03:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 05:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
If you continue removing sourced content without adequate explanation, as you did in Oromo language, you are cruising for another block. Learn from your previous experiences! LandLing 11:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)