User talk:Sharif The Tiger

Welcome!
Hello, Sharif The Tiger, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as BFJA Award for Best Actress Award, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!   Wikipelli Talk   12:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Thanks! Sharif The Tiger (talk) 09:53, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BFJA Award for Best Actress Award


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on BFJA Award for Best Actress Award requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Wikipelli Talk   12:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "BFJA Award for Best Actress"
BFJA Award for Best Actress, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content\, other than external links\, categories\, "see also" sections\, rephrasing of the title\, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 11:58, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Shikari (2016 film)Shikari (2016 film)


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Shikari (2016 film)Shikari (2016 film). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Shikari (2016 film). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Shikari (2016 film) – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GABgab 22:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Shakib Khan, did not appear constructive and has been or will be undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mar11 (talk) 15:17, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shakib Khan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:01, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shakib Khan was changed by Sharif The Tiger (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886974 on 2016-06-26T16:01:35+00:00.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Shikari (2016 film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Mar11 (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sadia Jahan Prova with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Gladamastalk 22:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sadia Jahan Prova, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sadia Jahan Prova was changed by Sharif The Tiger (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.942523 on 2016-06-26T22:38:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Meril Prothom Alo Awards, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Mar11 (talk) 05:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Sharif The Tiger, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ostitto (2016 film) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:52, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try to follow this. But I've a problem that you can help to solve. How can I add a photo in a wikipedia page? Is this necessary to write the link of the picture? Sharif The Tiger (talk) 01:41, 27 July 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:20, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:07, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

For this, which you re-submitted without references after my warning above. When you're ready to talk, feel free to respond below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:08, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks for persistent vandalism, as you did at List of highest-grossing Indian films. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

For this. You added Shikari to the list of highest-grossing Bengali films, claiming Rs. 17 crore, based on this reference, but the reference says nothing about Shikari. Your edit is indistinguishable from vandalism. When you are ready to discuss, feel free to do so below. The next block will be indefinite. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:38, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Nirab & --Kavita Radheshyam-Kavita-- at the audio release of --Sheitaan--.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Nirab & --Kavita Radheshyam-Kavita-- at the audio release of --Sheitaan--.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Blogs as references
Hi there, re: these changes, blogs are not suitable as references, because anyone with an internet connection can start a blog and print whatever they want. We're only interested in what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say about anything. Other examples of insufficient user-generated sources are discussion forums, unverified Twitter accounts, IMDb, Wikia, and even Wikipedia itself.

It's also worth pointing out that the source you used was printed on 24 October 2016, and the 24 October 2016 version of the Wikipedia article contains identical values, even the phrasing "The Bengali language film industry is centered in the Tollygunge neighborhood of the city of Kolkata," and "a 2014 report stated that while there were about 100 films created in Tollywood every year" are found both in our article and in the blog post. This means that the Wikipedia article existed first, and that blog merely scraped (stole) the content from Wikipedia without attribution. So, even if it weren't a blog, it would be a "circular reference" because we would be using Wikipedia data as a source in Wikipedia. Please stick to mainstream sites like legitimate Indian news sites. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)