User talk:Sharmapriya5590

Nomination of ITR-1 SAHAJ for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITR-1 SAHAJ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ITR-1 SAHAJ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  15:43, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination withdrawn
I have withdrawn the nomination of ITR-1 SAHAJ, after you have re-written the content. Hope you will continue updating the article and contributing to the Wikipedia. Thanks. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  05:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Form 2E


The article Form 2E has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Are we to have articles on every government form? What is so special about this one? The only sources are a snippet of nothing in particular and two refs citing a downloadable copy of the form - there is no substantive independent commentary.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 04:03, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Government forms
Hi, would it be possible for you to delay creating any more articles about government paperwork until we have determined whether or not any of those that you have already created should exist? It would be a shame to spend your time creating more and then discover that they are deleted. You'll have to wait a week or so to find out but that does not stop you from contributing on other subjects. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 04:06, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I asked you politely to stop creating these articles about forms but you are continuing to do so. Please feel free to join in the discussion at Talk:Form 2E but do not create any more until the issue is resolved. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 07:00, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 09:06, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Form 15CB
Hello, Sharmapriya5590,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Form 15CB should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Form 15CB.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Skrelk (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Form 2E for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Form 2E is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Form 2E until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Funny Pika! 02:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)