User talk:Sharon009

April 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vidya Vox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vidya Vox was changed by Sharon009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.854563 on 2020-04-24T21:30:39+00:00

Hello, I'm Whisperjanes. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Vidya Vox, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whisperjanes (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vidya Vox, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  Passenger pigeon  ( talk )  09:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Vidya Vox
Hi there! I noticed you continue to change the birth date on the page of subject "Vidya Vox". If you have a reliable source for this change, please include it and we can definitely make a change. Otherwise, please revert yourself and refrain from making these edits in the future. If you do not revert the edit, and/or provide sufficient reliable sources for your change, or continue to make such edits without proper sources and/or explanations in the future, I will have to post on a noticeboard. Please consider this both me reaching out as well as a warning. Apoorva Iyer (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Shirt58 (talk) 01:40, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Vidya Vox. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vidya Vox. Do NOT add content without providing a reliable source. This is your last warning. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯  talk  10:15, 26 April 2020 (UTC)