User talk:Sharon Herrera

Welcome
 Hello, Sharon Herrera, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Sharon Herrera, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wes Sechrest


The article Wes Sechrest has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dogsix (talk) 05:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wes Sechrest


A tag has been placed on Wes Sechrest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.globalwildlife.org/about-gwc/team/wes-sechrest/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog<i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Wes Sechrest. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 05:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Art into Acres


The article Art into Acres has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Can find no reliable sources that discuss this organization, and only a few for its sister organization 'Art to Acres'. Most of the sources used in the article, and most of the entries in the Bibliography, are actually about a different group -- The Nature Conservancy -- and do not mention Art into Acres, and this article does not describe any connection that the two groups may have. Possibly a violation of WP:PROMOTION."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- <b style="color: DarkOrchid"> DOOMSDAYER 520</b> (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:33, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Art into Acres
Hello. Are you connected in any way to Art into Acres? The article is quite promotional.--- Possibly (talk) 01:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello, I'm Sharon. Thanks for your guiding my improvement.
 * I took a Wiki coding class a MOMA and it has been some time. Wanting to get back into it, so I am working on 3 stubs this weekend: NY artist, LA museum, and eco-activism, and started one today. Sorry, my article seemed promotional. I believe in art and climate - that is my interest. I will work on the tone tomorrow. If you can point out what is off, I'll do it!! Thanks Possibly, Sharon Herrera (talk) 04:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Sharon Herrera pasted from my talk page--- Possibly (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks. I have pasted your reply on my talk page here, to keep the discussion together. Good on you for working on such interesting topics. You did not answer if you have a connection to the Art into Acres subject? It seems that you have been editing the page on the director of Art into Acres, Haley Mellin, since 2013, eight years ago!--- Possibly (talk) 04:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Yes, I took her class at MOMA! That is the connection that I mentioned earlier. Is that not OK? I thought I wrote a good article, and followed all the cues. This is somewhat discouraging. Can you show me where I went wrong on the article? Sharon Herrera (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC) Sharon
 * A reviewer will look at your article and let you know if it can stay up. From what I see, you have been trying to promote Art into Acres, both on the current page and earlier on Haley Mellin's page (example, example, example). My advice is to stop using Wikipedia to promote that organization, as WP:NOTPROMOTION. Pushing a subject in a non-neutral way as you have done on both pages actually does more harm than good to your cause, as it brings the scrutiny of experienced editors, and we tend to err on the side of caution. Good night. --- Possibly (talk) 04:55, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Sharon Herrera. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --- Possibly (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Museum reviews
Planned are edits on the following museum reviews:

India

Allahabad: Allahabad Museum Bhubaneswar: Odisha State Museum Chandigarh: Government Museum and Art Gallery, Chandigarh

New York

Ithaca: Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art Mountainville: Storm King Art Center Albany: Albany Institute of History & Art Beacon: Dia:Beacon Buffalo: Albright-Knox Art Gallery Corning: Corning Museum of Glass, Rockwell Museum Elmira: Arnot Art Museum

Topic areas
When I'm working on articles (day job/ arts writer), I mostly work on Art topics, especially environmental politics. I think the subject of museological and conservation based discourse is of interest, and a look at how visual culture plays a role. I look forward to how I can be of service and learn from the wiki tutorials.

Nomination of Art into Acres for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art into Acres is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Art into Acres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 20:15, 10 August 2021 (UTC)