User talk:Sharonlesliejeter

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minka Kelly, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Minka Kelly was changed by Sharonlesliejeter (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962144 on 2011-02-23T23:42:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Minka Kelly constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ℥nding · start 23:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Minka Kelly. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ℥nding · start 23:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC) This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Minka Kelly, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -Sitush (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Minka Kelly
Hi, two points: If you make your point once more without a verifiable source then I will move to have your account blocked from editing. I really do not want to do this but the situation is getting silly. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 00:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * you keep altering this statement but it is cited, so unless you can cite something to the contrary I'm afraid that the cite stands
 * your username suggestes that you may be in breach of WP:COI, which relates to conflicts of interest. This is unfortunate if you do have her (or Jeter's) best intestest at heart, but nonetheless true.