User talk:Shart000

July 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Amman message. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Q T C 08:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hello! I noticed at Amman message that you claimed to have permission to release the copyrighted material. Unfortunately, we cannot accept such claims at face value, as they have been made falsely before. Also, it would not be sufficient for you to have or give permission for use of the material on Wikipedia&mdash;we require all article text to be licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License or to be released to the public domain. This means that others would be able to use the text in any medium and for any purpose without your permission, not just on Wikipedia. If you do wish to do this, you may contact our OTRS team for assistance in verifying that you do indeed have permission to do so. Seraphimblade Talk to me 08:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC

I would like to post an article to this page again, I don't know how to use your OTRS system. I have an email from the author of the article saying that I may post it on wikipedia, can I use this as proof of permission? Thank you.
 * Since that page was recently deleted it should not be recreated. However if you can proof that the author of the article gave you permission. That should be fine. I hope this answers your question. King   Lopez  Contribs 08:56, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Is his email to me enough?
 * You can use the E-mail as proof. But please do not place any false infromation or you could be blocked by a administratior. King   Lopez  Contribs 09:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

October 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prince-Ghazi-no-2-Shmagh-23-12-03.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wknight94 talk  12:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Loveinthequran-ghazi-2011-english.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Loveinthequran-ghazi-2011-english.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ghazi with Shmagh Smiling 13.12.11.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ghazi with Shmagh Smiling 13.12.11.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad.jpg, which you've sourced to "His office" is not a valid source.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  S ENATOR 2029  (talk) 23:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

I did send an email to wikipedia with the permission granted by the copyright owner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.185.164.117 (talk) 23:30, 2 February 2012 (UTC)