User talk:Shashvat Vats

Speedy deletion nomination of Only for Singles
Hello Shashvat Vats,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Only for Singles for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:41, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Love Ok Please
Hello Shashvat Vats,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Love Ok Please for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 16:47, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Love Ok Please moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Love Ok Please, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:49, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Only for Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Only for Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Thinkistan.

User:Willbb234 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234Talk (please &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me in replies) 09:38, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Please don't move your incomplete drafts to mainspace
Please stop moving your incomplete drafts to mainspace. The ones which you have recently moved to mainspace have not been significantly improved since they were helpfully moved by another editor from mainspace to draft to give you time to improve them. You have made no attempt to provide properly cited references, and there is no sign that you have taken any notice of the advice which you received in reply to your question at WP:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1009. You had the opportunity to improve your drafts and submit them for AFC review to get further constructive comments, but instead of doing that you moved them to mainspace. It would therefore not surprise me if the new page patrol process resulted in the various pages being nominated for deletion. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello, I'm David Biddulph. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Kiski Sarkar. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 10:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Only for Singles moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Only for Singles, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 12:26, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello Shashvat Vats. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shashvat Vats. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey Tracy, thanks for the comment. I would like to clarify that I have been receiving absolutely zero compensation of any form for the edits I have been doing on Wikipedia. I have gone through the entire message and i want to assure you that I am not performing any form of paid advocacy for any particular topic or entity. I will ensure to submit the article creation through the articles for creation process first instead of directly. I would request you to let me continue with my edits and i will make sure to not present this sort of predicament in the future. Have an amazing day :)

October 2019
Your recent editing history at MX Player shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. GSS (talk |c|em ) 09:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Thinkistan


Hello, Shashvat Vats. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Thinkistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 20:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)