User talk:ShauneenBeukes

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 09:28, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jim1138 (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aspen Pharmacare. Jim1138 (talk) 09:37, 24 April 2017 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 09:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--ShauneenBeukes (talk) 11:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Your message above indicates that you have a conflict of interest. Hello, ShauneenBeukes. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 10:46, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Dear Jim - thank you for your revert - much obliged. I now understand your concerns re a COI. I will most certainly not attempt to edit any articles but to disclose updates / accuracies on the talk page. Further, please can you clarify for me for absolute certainty: - am I permitted to provide updates to the likes of governance and/or audited information such as revenue as well as statutory information concerning eg the board of directors, corporate timeline, global presence etc with links to the relevant Aspen web pages as reference or is this also viewed as being biased? Pardon the questions, but I'd rather err on the side of caution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShauneenBeukes (talk • contribs)


 * Please sign your talk with four tildes: "~"
 * If you understand the issues and will follow the COI/Paid guidelines, I would suggest making another wp:unblock request. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 11:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

. I'm inclined to consider unblocking this user on the promise above, combined with not permitting the specific edits listed above in the query part (though obviously, the user would be free to suggest that on the talk page). It looks to me like they've taken the time to read up on our policies and I think this demonstrates good faith and a likelihood to not repeat the previous inappropriate edits. --Yamla (talk) 12:10, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok. Materialscientist (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Guy (Help!) 17:34, 24 August 2019 (UTC)