User talk:Shayesteh.zamani

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tartaric acid has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tartaric acid was changed by Shayesteh.zamani (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882404 on 2016-11-23T10:10:54+00:00.

Welcome!
Hi, Shayesteh.zamani. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Wikishovel (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Tartaric acid. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 10:38, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tartaric acid, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Tartaric acid
Hello. I want to discuss this matter with you, before you get blocked by an administrator.

In tartaric acid, you've been repeatedly adding the word "Iranian" to describe Jābir ibn Hayyān:, , ,. If you carefully read the Jābir ibn Hayyān article, you'll see that his ethnicity is a matter of dispute among scholars, with some calling him Persian and others calling him Arab. Since there's no scholarly consensus yet, it's best to leave it out entirely, in case it's wrong. The source currently cited in tartaric acid does not mention his ethnicity, and on Wikipedia we can't simply add our own opinion or claim something without evidence: we have to supply WP:Reliable sources that WP:Verify the claim. If you want to learn how to add references to an article, please see Help:Introduction to referencing. You're also welcome to ask at Help desk or Teahouse if you have questions on how to add references, or if that's not quick enough, you can ask at my talk page. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)