User talk:Shaysdayz

Help me!
I'm new to editing on Wikipedia. I recently tried editing a biased article on the life of Abby Johnson and was shut down. Looking back I realize that my edit did not sound sufficiently neutral. I accept that. But what I cannot understand is why the language of the original article still remains as a supposedly unbiased account. It was a bit overwhelming trying to figure out how to voice my concern. Here is the article in question.

Shaysdayz (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking at your edits, it looks like the problem was with your preference for using the term "pro-life" rather than "anti-abortion" and so I'll address that. "Anti-abortion" is an unbiased term because it describes a person's stance in an incontrovertible way. They oppose abortion and therefore they're anti-abortion. Nobody can dispute that, whether they're pro- or anti-abortion. "Pro-life," on the other hand, is a biased term because it suggests that the other side is "anti-life" which they would naturally object to as it essentially suggests they support murder. Objectionable/loaded terms like "pro-life" don't belong in an encyclopedia and so your edits were reverted. I will now mark your question as answered; if you require additional feedback, don't hesitate to ask, either by asking another question here or by starting a discussion on the article's talk page. 78.28.54.103 (talk) 08:06, 31 March 2019 (UTC)