User talk:Shazrinarmk2015

Welcome!
Hello, Shazrinarmk2015, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rosemount International School (formerly Rosemount Kindergarten), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Rosemount International School (formerly Rosemount Kindergarten)


The article Rosemount International School (formerly Rosemount Kindergarten) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Kindergarten and elementary schools that do not satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rosemount International School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rosemount International School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rosemount International School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Rosemount International School. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 06:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alannah young


A tag has been placed on Alannah young requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 03:55, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Comparison to Canadian International School
Hi, I noticed you made a comment at the deletion discussion about the Candaian International School. Were you referring to Canadian International School (Singapore). The difference is that the CIS is a high school, which are normally kept on wikipedia. I understand Rosemount is a primary school only though. So unless it has some sort of notability, it is unlikely to be kept. Having said that, the CIS article is in horrible shape, so I have cleaned that up to. But because it is a high school, it won't be nominated for deletion. I've also noticed that you have changed the link on the Rosemount article so that it is now pointing to the school's website. That is a bad idea because, as I tried to explain before, parent testimonials are not the same as third party sources. The fact that they are published on the school's own website means it is only going to say good things. Regards, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi! Yes i was referring to that school. I understand that parent testimonial aren't the same but CIS uses it as a source and that's ok as there are....a high school? That is what i don't understand. And If I were to recreate Rosemount's page again, is it possible? The credible source that i found which was written by someone else was blocked by wikipedia. The rest of the sources are directory listings and such. Shazrinarmk2015 (talk) 05:43, 5 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I have cleaned up the CIS page also to remove the promotional puff. You can see the change I've made here, including removal of the parent testimonial link as it is not useful.
 * Why are high school articles kept but primary school articles deleted? That is because of WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Over the years there have been many deletion discussions about schools and the consensus of these discussions have been that high schools should be kept. As I've said before, an article on a primary school can be kept, but there must be evidence that it is notable.
 * If the Rosemount article is deleted you can create it again. However, if the article has the same problem (a lack of notability), then it is likely to be deleted again. If this happens too many times, the article is likely to be "salted", which means the article title is locked so that only an admin can create a new article with that name. If this happens and it is you who keeps recreating the article, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. So, in other words, if the article is deleted because the school is not notable, then creating a new one is a bad idea unless you find some new information that shows the school's notability.
 * At the moment, the deletion discussion appears that the article will be "redirected" to either Siglap or East Region, Singapore. That means if someone searches for "Rosemount International School", they will automatically be transferred to the article on the area. If that happens, you can add a short (1 or 2 sentence) description of the school to that page. You may need to create a new section for that. We can discuss the best way to do that. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Ok thank you for the thorough explanation. I understand a little bit more now. I have already updated the link in the External Link section for Rosemount International. I hope this is enough. :) Shazrinarmk2015 (talk) 00:48, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Rosemount kindergarten
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rosemount kindergarten, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://deletionpedia.org/en/Rosemount_International_School.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:21, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

By the way...
In case you haven't see it, I have replied to your latest question on my talk page. Regards, AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cheryl Young


A tag has been placed on Cheryl Young requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cahk (talk) 06:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shazrina


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Majora (talk) 04:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created, Shazrina, has been deleted from Wikipedia. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. larryv (talk) 08:29, 14 January 2016 (UTC)