User talk:Shealyhealy

The article Clairgnosis has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please don't use Wikipedia to promote your book. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clairgnosis
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Clairgnosis, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 03:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clairgnosis
A tag has been placed on Clairgnosis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 05:26, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * I stubbed clairgnosis down to the point where it shouldn't violate Wikipedia's standards, but by adding back all of that content you've assured deletion. Please read Five pillars for more information about Wikipedia. Pdcook (talk) 05:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup Tags
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pdcook (talk) 05:38, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Clairgnosis
I have nominated Clairgnosis, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Clairgnosis. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 07:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Sandbox
You seem to be doing a lot of experimenting with the clairgnosis article. I would like to draw your attention to the Sandbox, where you can experiment with syntax. Thanks, Pdcook (talk) 16:13, 11 November 2009 (UTC)