User talk:Shehzad.kazmi

AfD Nomination: Atkins Hotel Islamabad
I've nominated the article Atkins Hotel Islamabad for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Atkins Hotel Islamabad satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Atkins Hotel Islamabad. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Atkins Hotel Islamabad during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion.

Unspecified source for Image:Atkins Hotel 007.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Atkins Hotel 007.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - SCEhard T 19:57, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Images
Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I will be putting up Image:Atkins Hotel 001.jpg, Image:Atkins Hotel 002.jpg, Image:Atkins Hotel 003.jpg, Image:Atkins Hotel 004.jpg, Image:Atkins Hotel 005.jpg, and Image:Atkins Hotel 006.jpg at images for deletion as they are not currently employed in any articles. We would like to hear your thoughts at the discussion there. Thanks, Dar-Ape 16:26, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Shehzad kazmi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MER-C 09:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Shehzad Kazmi
A tag has been placed on Shehzad Kazmi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Oden 09:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects.  --Oden 10:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Shehzad Kazmi
I've added the "prod" template to the article Shehzad Kazmi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Shehzad Kazmi. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oden 10:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

Your edit to Shehzad Kazmi
Your recent edit to Shehzad Kazmi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of MultiLoad
I have nominated MultiLoad, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/MultiLoad. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- JediLofty UserTalk 15:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Tree full of secrets
Thanks for contributing new article Tree full of secrets. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at New contributors' help page, or just ask me.

The problem listed states that it is written from a fan's point of view and also that it feels like an advertisement. This is simply a track listing for a box set collection of Pink Floyd rarities. I don't think any of the above problems apply to this article. Maybe you'd like to revise your opinion?

Shehzad.kazmi (talk) 11:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC) Shehzad.kazmi

Fair use rationale for File:Pink_Floyd_Tree_Full_Of_Secrets_Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pink_Floyd_Tree_Full_Of_Secrets_Cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? feydey (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tree Full of Secrets


The article Tree Full of Secrets has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable fan-created bootleg.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Bongwarrior (talk) 11:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Laleh
I reverted your cut and paste move of the article. If you don't know how to move the article, or you think there will be any objection to your move, you need to follow the instructions at WP:RM. Cutting and pasting the article destroys the history of the edits, and is incompatible with Wikipedia's licensing. Syrthiss (talk) 12:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TPump


The article TPump has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Product advertisement with no notability indicaed in six years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

November 2015
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pepper's Ghost (Buckethead album), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 04:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)