User talk:SheikHussein

April 2023
Hello, I'm Sjö. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rashidun Caliphate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Please do not attempt to "hijack" an article to make it be about another subject. Sjö (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * First of all I can prove you that I'm right by giving you Quran verses and Hadith. I'm just here to tell the people the truth about Islam and who is supposed to rule Islam. SheikHussein (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi SheikHussein, I recommend you familiarize yourself carefully with Wikipedia's core content policies before you do any more editing, as your edits so far have been in violation of these policies. R Prazeres (talk) 18:28, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023 (2)
Your recent editing history at Gold dinar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You guys are banning me for telling the truth. Why would i put Imam Muhammed al Baqir (AS) why just him. I put him becuase it was him who created the first islamic coin. Abd malik marwan was orded to not use the roman coin becuase the romans diden't want him to use it. That was a problem to the Muslim economy so Abd malik marwan diden't now what to do so he orded Imam Muhammed al Baqir (AS) who was the grand son to the prophet Muhammed (SAW) to come to help him and solve the problem. Imam Muhammed Albaqir (As) said that we should creat an Islamic coin and put enogh amount of gold and silver. So they did that and the Islamic economy was saved non other than Imam Muhammed Al Baqir (AS). But Sadly some sunnis hate ahlul bayt and shias so they try to lie. I want to write the truth but apprently you guy say that my information is wrong (witch is not) so you banned me. I more likley to prove to you that I am tellig the truth with (Hadith) if you want ofcourse. And if you don't want thats okay. SheikHussein (talk) 21:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * What you believe is the "truth" is your personal religious point of view which appears to be based on Shia belief. That's not suitable for Wikipedia. Religious belief carries no weight and hadith carries little weight in Wikipedia. We only use modern historical scholarship. Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan is the originator of the gold dinar according to these works of modern scholarship:
 * pp.28, 94
 * You need to produce similar scholarly works if you want something different to appear in Wikipedia - not your religious opinions or hadith. DeCausa (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * What?
 * You don't follow scholarly you follow hadith or quran. And the hadith says it is Muhammed al baqir who is the originator of the gold dinar. It just like you say you don't follow a bible you follow a fake copy bible. And that is not shia bevlive it is also sunni belive. So pelease this sousces are usless only the hadith or quran is usefull. SheikHussein (talk) 23:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * And also please don't take perspectiv from a sunni side you will have to aslo take perpectiv from shia side. Becuase now you are teaching people the sunni perspectiv not shia perspctiv. I also said that sunnis also beleive Imam Muhammed baqir is is the originator of the gold dinar and that true but not all of them. This souces that you show me is sunni side not shia SheikHussein (talk) 23:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Btw im not trying to be rude or something elase so if it sounds like it than im trulley sorry. SheikHussein (talk) 23:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This may be shocking to you but that's right. We don't "follow" hadith and the quran. If you try to edit using those sources in the way you have been doing you will be stopped from editing Wikipedia. We use the work of (for example) modern historians, scientists and other academics in universities that are not putting forward a religious point of view (necessarily). Those sources are neither Sunni nor Shia. They're not even Muslim as such. DeCausa (talk) 06:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Okey if you say so! SheikHussein (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Okey if you say so! SheikHussein (talk) 11:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello SheikHussein! Your additions to Khalifa have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:28, 14 April 2023 (UTC)