User talk:Sheikh Zaman ll

February 2015
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sheikh Zaman ll (disambiguation). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 05:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Sheikh Zaman ll (disambiguation). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. red dogsix (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sheikh Award 2013.jpeg


A tag has been placed on File:Sheikh Award 2013.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dogsix (talk) 06:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sheikh Zaman. ''Please stop you disruptive editing. You will be banned from editing and creating articles if you continue.'' red dogsix (talk) 06:18, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh Zaman ll


A tag has been placed on Sheikh Zaman ll requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 06:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Sheikh Zaman ll. VeryCrocker (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sheikh zaman


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sheikh zaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VeryCrocker (talk) 08:27, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, including, but not necessarily restricted to: repeated attempts to use Wikipedia for self-promotion; continually removing speedy deletion notices from pages you have created, despite several messages informing you that doing so is unacceptable; deliberately making false claims, such as posting notices to talk pages about deletion discussions which have never taken place; sometimes outright vandalism, as for example in this edit. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Wgolf (talk) 06:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Joseph2302 (talk) 23:44, 19 March 2015 (UTC)