User talk:Sheilaevans

September 2022
Hello Sheilaevans. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sheilaevans. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 07:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, I left a discloser of potential conflict of interest on my user page. I will repost here Sheilaevans (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your user page one is sufficient, thank you. I removed the "nowiki" coding preventing its proper display. Be advised that any article about your department must summarize what independent reliable sources choose on their own to say about it, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. It shouldn't just document the existence of the department, tell of its staff, and what it considers to be its own history. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I find it astonishing that you included copyright information in your draft for your employer, the more astonishing since you are being paid to do this. Paid editors are paid precisely because they will use that payment to understand all the rules here, but breach of copyright runs far beyond that. There is a full copyright statement at the foot of the page you copied, it says "". That the UofC is your employer does not give you the right to use their text verbatim unless you have asserted that you have that right via WP:VRT, and that assertion has received formal approval. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:55, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sheilaevans/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Sheilaevans/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:331dot&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Sheilaevans/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 07:34, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Sheilaevans/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Sheilaevans/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Sheilaevans/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Sheilaevans/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Sheilaevans/sandbox
Hello, Sheilaevans. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Sheilaevans/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Sheilaevans/sandbox


Hello, Sheilaevans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)