User talk:Shekarzicklin

A tag has been placed on Sarvana bhavan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste 16:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I thought I was fixing the ((hangon)) tag that you had mis-spelled, but if you don't want the article in Wikipedia, leave things the way they are. Accounting4Taste 16:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:The Big Bull.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:The Big Bull.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Big Bull
A tag has been placed on The Big Bull, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Tckma 13:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Tiffin Wallah
The article Tiffin Wallah has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 21:57, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. --lquilter 20:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Page deleted again. Sorry, it was a well laid out article, and seems like a great restaurant, but it it not "notable". Rich Farmbrough, 10:37 3 October 2007 (GMT).

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 19:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Despite numerous chances, you haven't yet asserted why this restaurant is notable, or provided any reliable independent sources that would support such an assertion. If there are other restaurant articles that fail to meet these standards, please let us know. See generally WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. NawlinWiki 19:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Sorry, "I found it really unique" doesn't establish notability for purposes of writing an encyclopedia article. I strongly suggest you read Verifiability. NawlinWiki 19:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

King Cobra
My bad, that page is heavily vandalized. If you could include references to the new material, please do so. Also...I don't believe Kings shed their fangs like vipers do.--Mike Searson 13:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out with that page and adding the references, it's appreciated. If you're interested you may want to join the Reptiles and Amphibians project. Sorry again about the mixup!--Mike Searson 13:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Honda-activa.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Honda-activa.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 13:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. . Cheers_Ad@m.J.W.C. 13:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Honda-activa.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Honda-activa.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)