User talk:Shekhar Jyoti Das

Speedy deletion nomination of Asom sattra mahasabha


A tag has been placed on Asom sattra mahasabha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Flow 234 (Nina)  talk  10:58, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Shekhar Jyoti Das/Asom sattra mahasabha


A tag has been placed on User:Shekhar Jyoti Das/Asom sattra mahasabha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://asomsattramahasabha.org/about.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  19:41, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Of Srimanta Sankardev Sangha.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Logo Of Srimanta Sankardev Sangha.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Indic script
Please STOP adding Indic script to articles on the English Wikipedia. This should NOT be added as per WP:INDICSCRIPT which includes the lead section and infoboxes. I have removed the scripts you added today, assuming you did not know about this, but as you are now aware, any further additions will be considered language-warring/vandalism. - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 16:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Assam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dispur, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 17:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Assam Police. - Arjayay (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Assam Rifles. Adamgerber80 (talk) 18:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Davaka, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 19:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * You are blocked 12 hours for disruptive editing, please address the concerns Arjayay has with your edits. Use  to alert them to your replies. -- John Reaves 19:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muga silk. Your 12 hour block has just expired, and you immediately re-start the same disruption - if you do not stop, your next block will be longer, if not indefinite - Arjayay (talk) 10:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Katietalk 22:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Assam Police. Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muga silk. These are the same disruptive edits that you were blocked for previously, so you have no excuse - Arjayay (talk) 16:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If I see you make one more edit where you a. falsely represent what's in the sources b. combine "Assam" and "silk" in some illegitimate or promotional way, I will block you indefinitely. Arjayay, Katie, what say you? Drmies (talk) 17:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Drmies - please do - I've just had to undo it yet again - Arjayay (talk) 17:51, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I know: you just beat me to it. Shekhar Jyoti Das, you added "Assam". The source does not say "Assam". You upped "five" to "six". The source has five. In other words, you are showing a pattern of disruptive edits in which you seem to want to promote Assam as a silk-producing state. That's great, but you can't do that on Wikipedia. Worse, you are making our text say things that are not true, and leaving the source as it is, suggesting your text has authority based on that source: that's about the worse thing that can happen to an encyclopedia, since it gives the reader less of a reason to trust us. For that reason I am going to block your account indefinitely. Perhaps this is a good occasion for you to reflect on what you did and what that means. You may try and request an unblock, but it better show evidence of such reflection. Drmies (talk) 17:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2017 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 04:44, 29 July 2018 (UTC)