User talk:Shekhar in

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Shekhar in/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Shekhar in/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Shekhar_in/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Shekhar_in/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:52, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

User:Shekhar in/sandbox


Hello, Shekhar in. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Shekhar in/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 03:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:K. C. Pandey, from its old location at User:Shekhar in/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 17:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Shekhar in! Thank you for your contributions. I am Liance and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:54, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

added map of Kheda tehsil
Hi ! I have added map of Kheda

as per requirement on community portal.

I didn't delete the original one. Hope that's fine.

Regards,

Shekhar

AFC
Hi! I have redone the topic ( K C Pandey ) which I tried during my first submission ( which was refused). I did a through study for AFC as per Wikipedia & about the topic & daily work on it! I don't want this time time to fail, so I humbly request to give a quick look at my creation & let me know the flaws if any before final review to publish. I understand about the time constraint so I'm asking for just an overview. If done I'll be able to make the changes as advised! I'll be highly thankful. Though being my 1st AFC I'll keep updating on the subject as I get to know more of it. I think I'm clear with my words.

Thanks & rgds, Shekhar Shekhar in (talk) 20:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Your draft is here Draft:K. C. Pandey but you have been editing a different version on your user page,Your user page is a page for telling us a little about yourself as regards to Wikipedia editing, it is not a place to create articles.~ Theroadislong (talk) 16:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Theroadislong for the guidance. I have taken proper action as required & indeed learned how to do it practically. Shekhar in (talk) 09:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Thanks ! Shekhar in (talk) 01:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft
An editor left advice in answer to your query at Teahouse. The reply:"You have too many External Links! Some like this one only serve to support any statement saying that Pandey was general president of the Indian Science Congress Association around 2010. So it should be used as an inline citation, or be removed completely. I think you should remove the 'general references' subsection, and use those sources as inline citations, or not at all. The 'See also' sections contains at least two links to articles which have already been used in the main text, so there's no need for them to be repeated there. the 2002 story about the 'Muhnochwa' grasshopper seems irrelevant and should be removed. Did you check where the wikilink from Muhnochwa actually goes to? It made no sense to me at all. All in all - a nice job. As you knew him as a studnet, please pop a WP:COI notice on your userpage to avoid any issues. (I must declare I forgot to do that when I wrote about one of my botany lecturers and my botany professor some years ago...but by then it had been 40 years since I last encountered them! If you look at those pages, you'll see they're quite short. There's nothing wrong with that.) Stick to the verifiable facts and cut out anything unsupported or trivial, and it'll sail through review."

I agree with the suggestions. David notMD (talk) 14:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot David notMD for kind guidance. I've noted all the points mentioned & will do in accordance. It's great to know that you are from Botany background, the reason you did understand about the importance of research work. So I'll stick as advice. Kind guidance is much appreciated.
 * My training and career are actually biochemistry, but I have an avid interest in natural sciences. The draft is much improved, There are still statements of fact that do not have citations. The Reviewer (I am not a Reviewer) with either accept - promoting it to main space; Decline - giving reasons why; or Reject (very unlikely for this draft). If Declined, work to address the shortcomings (you can do that while waiting for the review), and then resubmit. If you do not understand what the Reviewer is asking for, can ask that person directly on their Talk page. Good luck. David notMD (talk) 19:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks again David notMD That's great! Biochemistry is more interesting than pure Botany. Now what you told me is of great help as I will start from scratch to see where & what is needed to make the subject worth to be published. Citations will be added as required or the stuff not worth for AfC will be deleted. I really feel indebted to all those who are helping me & find this place is full of people ready to help (for really nothing to gain much) I dont know is it suitable to ask my last & final query here or go to Tea House for the same. So just trying my luck ( will get to know more ). Am I supposed to do anything extra for review or keep working on the draft & patiently wait for the draft to be Reviewed as per my submission time & 7weeks as I know. Thanks for the wishes. Hope it passes.
 * The AfC backog of drafts is >2,000 drafts. IT IS NOT A QUEUE. Reviewers pluck out what they want to review. So, could be days, weeks, or sadly, months. I do not see a need to start from scratch. And I believe the person is notable. David notMD (talk) 20:06, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

David notMD A final thanks as of now for all the kind guidance. I guess now i got to know almost all the nitty-gritty of the topic.

Your submission at Articles for creation: K. C. Pandey has been accepted
 K. C. Pandey, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=K._C._Pandey help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2020 (UTC)