User talk:ShelfSkewed/Archive 6

=2013=

A cup of coffee for you!

 * Thanks for the kind words--and I do love coffee! -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Good work! Media coverage:


 * The Daily Dot
 * PC World
 * Yahoo News Andreas JN 466 03:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Ho-ly ish! I particularly noticed the comment in the Daily Dot story that I "decided...for no apparent reason, to delve into the article's sources." If anyone cares how I got into this, it was as a result of checking and correcting ISBNs from Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs. It was the purported Oxford University Press book that I singled out in my AfD nomination that set me off. I have never had any difficulty tracking down a book from that publisher, so I dug a little harder, expanded my search to the article's other sources, and then started looking for any sources that would support the topic of the article. That's how it happened.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I guess hoaxers should learn to omit ISBN numbers then ... :) Well done. I had a similar case once: Another one: do a Google search for Erica Feldman hair straightener and then read section 4 of . The real inventor was Madam C. J. Walker. "Ian Gutgold" is another name widely credited on the Internet with that invention. That name too was originally inserted in Wikipedia as a joke, but stuck around for long enough to get all over the Internet. Cheers, Andreas  JN 466 05:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Two more mentioning you, from Israel and Finland: . I reckon this story will go round the world ... Andreas JN 466 05:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * +1, good work. VegaDark (talk) 05:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice detective work! Your discovery also made it to the Netherlands. One of the larger national newspapers, Volkskrant, published an article titled "On Wikipedia a war raged for 5 years that never existed.".--Wolbo (talk) 00:54, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Bicholim conflict
Hi, you sent me this notification, because you assumed that I created that article. Well, I didn't create that article. You should have checked the contributors list. I only nominated it for c/e, and even I didn't know that it was a hoax. I hail from Mangalore, not Goa. So, I am not really an expert on Goan history. But I am an honest person, and my conscience prevents me from doing such things. I used to contribute to Wikipedia to spread information, not misinformation. That article was probably the cynical work of a prankster. I had no idea that this is how it appeared to you, or else I would have clarified this earlier. Regards, Joyson Prabhu   Holla at me!   13:02, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am capable of reading an edit history, and I was aware that you were not the creator of the article. I was following the guidance at WP:AFD: "While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion." (Emphasis added.) I left notices not just for you but for several other editors who had made multiple or substantial edits to the article. I was not trying to imply that you were the originator of the article, or that you were in any way aware of or complicit in a hoax. I was attempting to draw the attention of as many interested editors as possible to help determine whether the article was, in fact, a hoax. I'm sorry if I caused you any distress, but that was far from my intention.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  15:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my irrational behaviour! I wasn't thinking straight. I actually got paranoid and over-reacted, because of a follow-up comment by another user. Joyson Prabhu   Holla at me!
 * Yes, that would have put me on my guard as well. I hope no one else mistakenly points a finger at you. Believe me, I did not expect this thing to become such a big deal. Best, -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  17:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Great work. Thorough, and courteous too. The project can use more editors like you. I found out about your discovery through an article in TechCrunch. Reference-checking on Wikipedia is a wonderful thing. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 14:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Sherlock Holmes of Wikipedia

 * I'm not sure my investigative or deductive capabilities are any match for Holmes's, but I appreciate the thought. Cheers!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  15:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Best regards from Cologne (Germany)! I read about you :


 * http://web.de/magazine/digitale-welt/internet/16958948-gefakter-wikipedia-eintrag-bleibt-5-jahre-unentdeckt.html#.A1000018


 * --Neun-x (talk) 20:56, 4 January 2013 (UTC) (25.000 Edits in over 10.000 articles in de.wikipedia.org)
 * Now in The Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2257482/The-war-Wikipedia-fooled-years-Bicholim-Conflict-article-elaborate-4-500-word-hoax.html?ito=feeds-newsxml I think this is now itself a notable topic qualifying for a Wikipedia article. ;) Andreas JN 466 08:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

You got mentioned by the Daily Mail
I looked and nobody mentioned it yet on your talk page but I just wanted to give you a heads up in case you hadn't seen it, you got mentioned by the Daily Mail in the UK for busting Bicholim Conflict hoax. The article is here in case you want to read it. I'm sure you're hearing it a lot but nice job on doing all the research and uncovering the hoax.  Cat-five t  c   11:10, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the link. (And equal thanks to Andreas/Jayen466 who also notified me, above.) I don't even know how to react anymore. There were other WP hoaxes that evaded detection longer. Did they receive this kind of attention? I'm certainly not unhappy about other editors saying nice things about me, but since I'm about 90% gnome, I'm hoping this will die down soon. Regards,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  19:15, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I sympathize but it doesn't seem to be dying down [per and this, both of which mention you by name.  If it's any consolation the tone of all the articles mention you but seem to be focused more on how could Wikipedia have a hoax up for 5 years (and put it up for FA status).  Don't worry though it will pass and you can get back to stealing socks (not to be confused with banning socks which is for admins) or whatever it is you gnomes do.  Cat-five  t  c   21:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * My apologies, according to Gnome you guys don't steal socks, you sit on dairy products.  Cat-five t  c   21:36, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Reminds me of that old elephant joke: Q: How do know if there's an elephant in your refrigerator? A: Footprints in the butter. For the record, my derriere is dairy free.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  22:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * How do they know you are from "Missouri"? Your user page only mentions "Washington"! Did they take your interview? --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The first line of my user page says that I live in Webster Groves, Missouri. Perhaps you were looking at the userbox for my alma mater, Washington University in St. Louis? No one has asked me for an interview yet.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  22:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Also here. 122.161.17.134 (talk) 18:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And in Swedish newspapers, if you’re interested. --Lundgren8 (t · c) 22:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And The Indian Express. 五代  (talk) 10:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * , Just because. Till 14:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

A lesson well learned. Thank you for a job well done. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎</b>) 20:21, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * .. and also in Italian newspapers :-) --Maxbeer (talk) 15:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Nobody has mentioned the Times of India and Republika (Indonesia) yet ... I told you this one would go around the world. Took about a week, but it got there. Andreas JN 466 03:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)


 * FYI, I co-authored a write-up of the story and its spread through the world's media here. Best, Andreas JN 466 02:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Interesting story, although I'm not sure it's entirely fair to use an incident like this to flog Wikipedia in particular. As others have pointed out, hoaxes can be found throughout human history. The only difference here is the medium. If this prompts closer scrutiny of other articles, though, I suppose that can only be good thing.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you! A job well done!

 * Fictitious or not, I will display it proudly. Many thanks!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  21:11, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Given the Portugese Indian provenance of the escutcheon, it was a perfect fit.  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 21:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Communication—one of the most Cogent Constituents of my Continuance in this Cyberspace known as "my Wikipediaworld", is the Camaraderie between editors such as you two Chums. "Diolch yn fawr!" – Gareth Griffith-Jones   – The Welsh  Buzzard''  – 13:42, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * "Cyfarchion!"

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you kindly. This is going to give me a swelled head: Next I'm going to AfD the Main Page. Have you seen that thing? It's just a collection of random information, and it discusses several living people and not a single reference!<Do I really need a smiley here?>-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Nice one! It certainly fails BLP as it stands... On the other matter, though, with 15 sources already it's surely got it's own notability by now.( my apologies; Andreas has already noticed this. Moonraker12 (talk) ) And what about book deals? Anyone asked about film rights? The story has everything! WikiGnome uncovers fake story going back years; I'm thinking...The Hobbit meets All The President's Men. It'll be huge! Moonraker12 (talk) 14:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Athens
Hey again and a happy new year!If you look again in the Athens climate section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athens#Climate the monthly values have been changed again.I ve noticed this keeps happening a lot.Could you please restore it again?I would hate to create a mess again!Also is it possible to lock the article or the climate section at least?It keeps on happening again and again and it is really annoying.Thank u!


 * ✅-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:53, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Stone Age (band)
The French band Stone Age does exist and has its WP entries in French, Spanish and Japanese languages :

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_Age_%28groupe%29

http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stone_Age_%28banda%29

http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B9%E3%83%88%E3%83%BC%E3%83%B3%E3%83%BB%E3%82%A8%E3%82%A4%E3%82%B8_%28%E3%83%90%E3%83%B3%E3%83%89%29

Here are the 4 albums of the band on Allmusic : http://www.allmusic.com/artist/stone-age-mn0000624490

and the official website of the band : http://www.stone-age.fr/eng/disco.html


 * Disambiguation pages at en.wikipedia are for navigation to information available on the English Wikipedia. For a topic to be listed it must either have an article or be supported by the content of another article. An entry without a blue link is not useful. First create the article, then list it on the disambiguation page. Regards,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  22:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Not any box-office Film, Bloodlines

 * '13:45, 2 April 2012 ShelfSkewed (talk | contribs) moved page Bloodlines (2005 film) to Bloodlines (film) (Simplify)'

A tag was placed on Bloodlines (2005 film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page. There's other work with that title, before and since. --88.111.47.108 (talk) 02:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Nightingales
Good job on the Nightingales article! I've been waiting for years to see this get written on here. I remember that show from back in 1989 and all the controversy it caused. OGBranniff (talk) 10:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the kind words. I remembered the show only vaguely myself, but I created the article to resolve a disambiguation issue I thought needed to be improved (i.e. the UK series owning the plain title Nightingales). I'm glad you found the effort worthwhile for other reasons. Cheers!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  13:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Bodhidharma a.o
Thanks for the fixes on Bodhidharma and Zen lineage charts! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  16:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Ovid
Okeh, I see it down there now. But a person looking for it, thinking it was singular in Ovid and possibly not remembering Ovid as the author, would, I think, look at the lit. section and give up. I certainly did not think to scroll down past all the music stuff to find it. Can't we make it more "findable" for the kind of user I'm thinking of?Kdammers (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I thought I'd replied to this last night, but I must have been a little sleepy and forgot to save. Is the See also addition an acceptable solution? Regards,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  16:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguate
Hello Shelf skew, Can you Disambiguate: Blue Bloods to Blue Bloods (TV series). in the article Corbin Bleu. And Source here: http://www.tv.com/shows/blue-bloods/family-business-2557904/. And write it in the Acting career. Better to complete the article. Thank you for your contributions in Wikipedia. Greetings. --37.106.109.181 (talk) 05:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I have dabbed the link. As for adding a mention of the appearance in the main text, I don't think it's really necessary to note every minor role in an actor's bio. Regards, -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, no problem with that. Because I do not see any interest in this article. I hope to be a good article. Thank you for the service. --37.106.109.181 (talk) 05:22, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for extra work
Hi ShelfSkewed, sorry for messing with DAB link to thin blue/red line articles. I will defer to your expertise. --Malerooster (talk) 17:49, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Use of the (disambiguation) redirect is an odd-seeming but useful guideline that many editors are unfamiliar with. Cheers!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  17:52, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Articles with invalid ISBNs
Aha! So you're why these are getting fixed faster than I'm fixing them ;-)... Thanks for the help, and hopefully we can get this down to a more manageable size soon! If you are so inclined, please feel free to edit User:Storkk/Nontrivial ISBN Issues - which I think should probably end up in WP-space at some point, if I can figure out how to format it better... It might save duplicated effort. Or don't, however you prefer. All the best, Storkk (talk) 20:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I've been working on these for about 8 or 9 months; the category used to have almost 17K pages. My strategy has been to fix the easier errors and leave the harder ones alone, and then sort through those difficult cases and come up with a plan to deal with them--in other words, kick the can down the road. But I've been coming around to the point of view that even these harder ISBN issues don't need to become a headache. Including an ISBN with a reference is entirely optional and not essential for nailing down a source. So if an ISBN is so broken that it is no help in finding or verifying a source, perhaps the best course of action is to just remove it. Like the nice lady in the loan commercial says: Problem solved. -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  21:37, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, I had only checked about 1k of your edits, sorry for the misunderstanding. My philosophy is a little different regarding invalid ISBNs, seeing as it was the search for one that uncovered the Bicholim conflict nastiness... and now just looking that up, I feel enormously stupid, seeing that you were the one that found it. I'll just slink away now, after paying you huge respect for finding that one - that is, after all, why we do this. Storkk (talk) 11:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Please don't slink anywhere. I'm very happy that someone else has taken an interest in cleaning up those ISBNs; my motivation comes and goes, and I'm glad that progress is being made even when I'm not working on them. And you're absolutely right that a bad ISBN can signal a more serious problem. But a fraudulent source is a really exceptional case. The Bicholim conflict sources are the only ones I've encountered among the thousands of refs I've fixed. Unless, that is, some of those tough ones that I chose to leave alone for the time being are actually made up--so keep up your examination of those toughies. Regards,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your work
Sorry for my weak English.

I send you my tiny tribute for your search Bicholim Conflict.

--81.172.79.18 (talk) 18:00, 18 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure which article you are referring to, but I am glad I was able to help. And your Inglés is certainly superior to my Español. Cheers! -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  18:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Merge discussion for List of books about philosophy
An article that you have been involved in editing, List of books about philosophy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Anthrophilos (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC) Anthrophilos (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Got Dumas Malone?
Hi ShelfSkewed, thanks for your comment on the Thomas Jefferson talk page. I noticed you fancy yourself as a book collector who has a lot of books (no really, a lot) :-) and was wondering if you possessed Dumas Malone's six-volume biography of Thomas Jefferson. If you do it would be nice to see someone use it (more often) to cite various items on the Thomas Jefferson page. If you possess it but are not inclined to research and citation work would it be alright if I inquired with you about items in the future? I spend most of my time providing citations and adding bibliographies to the various pages that need them but don't as yet have his works. Currently I am getting the Jefferson bibliography in order. It was a mess and still needs more attention. Sometime in the (hopefully near) future I intend to buy the six-volume work by Malone. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I regret to say that I can't be of much help in that area. My collecting interests are primarily in American fiction. I do have a good reading library of history books, but very little that is highly specialized or hard to come by. I do wish you good luck with your project, though. Regards,-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Fly High (answer)
I answered on Talk:Fly High. I'm not a native English speaker. So, I hope you understand.--이형주 (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

NHL Series Soundtracks
The unknown users vandalized the NHL Soundtacks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.209.63.83 (talk) 05:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Get Over It
Just have.-- <font color="#F00">Laun <font color="#F00">chba <font color="#F00">ller 13:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Works for me. Cheers!-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

The IP's are back!
ShelfSkewed, those IP's who vandalized the NHL Soundtracks returned on March 22 & 24 2013!

Regarding your edit on Because of You
I noticed that you had reverted one of my edits on Because of You regarding the fact that Because of You (Reba McEntire and Kelly Clarkson song) is a redirect to Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song). You are correct in the fact that they both point towards the same article; however, "Because of You (Reba McEntire and Kelly Clarkson song)" redirects to a specific section in "Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song)", and thus should be listed separately on the disambiguation page "Because of You". Reverting that edit as good faith would only serve a purpose if the link Because of You (Reba McEntire and Kelly Clarkson song) was listed in Because of You (Kelly Clarkson song), which it is not. If you do not feel this is correct, please cite to me part of MOS:DAB that states otherwise; I was just looking at it, and did not see such a thing stated in it. <font color="DarkSlateGray">Steel1943 (talk) 05:56, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Copied and replied to at Talk:Because of You.

Barnstar

 * Thank you! That was unexpected, but I really appreciate it. Now I wonder if we'll get any feedback. I frankly expected opinions to come down on both sides since there are some editors who think that notable covers should have separate articles anyway. We'll see. -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Happy Wikibirthday
I was doing a search about the hoax of Bicholim conflict, when I saw that is your Wikibirthday. Happy Wikibirthday!--Innocenti Erleor (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Hard to believe it's been seven years... -- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject U2 invitation
Hello! This message is to inform you that WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

<span style="font-family:'Segoe Script',cursive"> Miss Bono   (zootalk)  18:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

The Creator (book)
Dear ShelfSkewed, thank you for fixing the title of The Creator (book) since it is not a novel but a poetry book. There is another book titled, The Shape by Dejan Stojanović, which may need to be renamed. The titles as The Shape and The Creator are very general and therefore cannot be created as such (since other articles with the same name already exist). Maybe The Shape article should also be The Shape (book) and if you agree, please rename it. The article is at. Best regards, Mountlovcen8 (talk) 20:33, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  04:15, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
for fixing my Till I Loved You disambiguation page; however, please leave the Higher Ground link up as I fully intend to create that article as a non-redirect.-- Laun  chba  ller  16:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Why insist on the link before the article is created? Write the article first.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  16:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * To get an orphan template slapped across it? I'll be on it shortly, but that's some nasty catch 22 situation right there.-- Laun  chba  ller  16:44, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Any experienced editor who tags an article as an orphan without giving its creator a chance to create the links should be trouted.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  16:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll bear that in mind.-- Laun  chba  ller  17:03, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on Ashkenazi Jews talk page - should Sholem Aleichem be in the collage
Hi :-) Due to the fact I saw you interested in the topic, I thought you might want to take part in it.

There is a discussion on the Talk:Ashkenazi Jews regarding should Sholem Aleichem and Mikhail Botvinnik be in the collage or not. The discussion is called "Ones and for all, should Sholem Aleichem and Mikhail Botvinnik be in the collage".

Please take part in the vote and state your opinion on the topic. Thank you! 90.196.60.197 (talk) 15:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=555227331 your edit] to Syed Altafuddin Ahmed may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].

Peter Rodgers Organization
Have you gotten any sort of communication regarding this article? Q T C 19:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * No. I just went there to disambiguate a link, and I haven't heard anything else about the edit or the article.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  20:30, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Weird, I got contacted through LinkedIn by some lawyer about some supposed edits that I made on their page, but since I haven't even visited it till today and you were one of the only recent editors I was trying to figure out what the heck they were talking about. Since as far as I can tell, there hasn't really been anything on there of note. Q  T C 21:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


 * That is very strange. Could it have been some kind of phishing expedition? Or perhaps it's a practical joke by someone whose vandalism you reverted? Both of those seem pretty implausible, and I'm out of guesses. Anyway, if anyone contacts me, I'll certainly let you know.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  21:54, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * It was really only a tiny contribution, but I thank you for your kind gift.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  05:27, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

"Unlink correct"
Hi. The various concepts in JoJolion and its parent series are often named after musical pieces or artists. Therefore, "Born This Way" and "Going Underground" are proper links as they are directing people to the namesake.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 16:09, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  19:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

As the guy who re-arranged Beautiful People to accommodate the bands,
I'd like your opinion. Chartarchive.org aggregates the two Beautiful People as the same band (copied ref from "Turn Up the Music"). Is this enough to show that the two groups are the same?-- Laun  chba  ller  22:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)


 * I looked at that earlier, too, and I just couldn't decide. I also saw that in most sources the '90s band is referred to as just "Beautiful People", but the 2012 cover group is sometimes shown as "The Beautiful People". So I made the choice to treat them as separate bands unless and until someone comes up with a reliable source that demonstrates that they are the same act. Do you have any information (other than the Chartarchive page) that suggests that they are they same? I looked around a little and didn't come up with anything.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  03:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't have any information other than chartarchive.com which says anything about the 2012 cover group! I suggest we expand the hatnote to say "Beautiful People are also a cover group who had a #100 hit with Turn Up the Music ".-- Laun  chba  ller  11:35, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't notice until you mentioned it that you had shortened the hatnote on the band article. As long as the hatnote either points to the dab page or mentions both of the other possibilities (don't forget the Norwegian band), users will have a path for navigation--so whichever you think is best.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:00, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I reckon they're the same people and so does the only available source. I've merged the articles, but if you find any evidence that says otherwise, feel free to revert.-- Laun  chba  ller  14:47, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That's fine with me--as I said, I wasn't sure. But I am going to edit the hatnote to point directly to the Norwegian band. With only one additional use it's the same amount of clutter at the top of the page and it saves users a click.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  14:54, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Please help page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song)
Hello, I saw that you help to add a cover for Paula and Seling song page in 2010, Playing with fire, please cand you put this single official cover to this page Miracle (Paula Seling and Ovi song), and if you can, help edit the page, describing the composition, critical reception.

Thanks a lot, I speak in the name of Paula manager, means a lot for us. Miracle Official Image 2A02:2F0E:D25F:FFFF:0:0:4F74:D76D (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 3 March 2014 (UTC)   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0E:D2EF:FFFF:0:0:4F72:C6ED (talk)

My WP entry
Hi, ShelfSkewed!

My Wikipedia entry is a little out of date, but obviously I don't want to violate community standards by editing it myself. You've edited it a bit in the past, so I thought I'd drop you a note and mention the updates that I think might be relevant, and leave it up to you whether they're worth making. Hope that's appropriate.

Here's what I'd suggest adding/changing:

• I've added the New Yorker to my list of credits. Here is an article that appeared in the magazine, and here is a second piece that appeared only as online content.

• I've written another book: How Not To Kill Your Baby.

• According to the WP entry for Abraham Cronbach, I signed his Jewish Pacifist pledge in 1942. That was decades before I was born! I suspect it was a different Jacob Weinstein who gets the credit for that. (Unless I am an immortal being with a very bad memory, which I suppose I can't rule out.) Might make sense to de-link the "Jacob Weinstein" in that article from my WP page, and perhaps create a page for the other Jacob Weinstein. I suspect it was the one who occurs about 2/3rds down this list of Great Chicago Rabbis of the 20th Century, but I can't find a definitive source to prove my theory. These excerpts from the book "Rabbi Jacob J Weinstein, Advocate of the People" are the closest I could come, but in the absence of more context, I don't think they're definitive.

• The entry for Dennis Miller Live includes a list of the show's writers. Each writer's name is hyperlinked to the relevant article -- except for mine. Might be worth linking my name to my article.

If you think any of these changes are worth making, thanks in advance for making them. And if not, thanks anyway for considering them!

With best wishes, Jacob Sager Weinstein (talk) 13:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I fixed the last two requests. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 01:20, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Great-- thanks! Best wishes,Jacob Sager Weinstein (talk) 10:15, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Added all your books. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 20:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Missing Wikipedians
Hey, ShelfSkewed, Just wanted to let you know I added your name to Missing Wikipedians. Feel free to remove your name if you return or don't want it listed. You're missed! Liz <sup style="font-family:Times New Roman;"><b style="color:#006400;">Read!</b> <b style="color:#006400;">Talk!</b> 22:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Glad Tidings and all that ...
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

=2014=

Nomination of Songs of The Monsters in the Morning for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Songs of The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Songs of The Monsters in the Morning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <font color="#FFFFFF">Levdr1 <font color="#FF0000">lp / <font color="#000000">talk  20:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

StL Wiknic 2014
You are invited to join us at our Wiknic on Sun, July 6, 2014: St. Louis Wiknic. Hope to see you there! Mark Schierbecker (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Merry Merry
To you and yours FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

=2015=

Happy New Year!
<div style="background:orange; padding: 10px; border-top: 3px solid yellow; border-left: 3px solid yellow; border-right: 3px solid yellow; border-bottom: 3px solid yellow 8px; font-size: 110%; font-family:Tahoma; text-align: center;"> Dear, HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions! From a fellow editor, --FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Nomination of Just Between Us (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Between Us (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Just Between Us (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 13:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bertram Yacht


The article Bertram Yacht has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Promotional

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 23:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

=2016=

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Get Real listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:Get Real. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:Get Real redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

=2017=

Proposed deletion of The good doctor (phrase)


The article The good doctor (phrase) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Dicdef, no sources"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of The good doctor (phrase) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The good doctor (phrase) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The good doctor (phrase) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve The Ties That Bind (Jeeves and Wooster)
Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. ShelfSkewed, thanks for creating The Ties That Bind (Jeeves and Wooster)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Note that IMDB is sometimes useful for certian things, and for external links, but it isn't generally considered a reliable source

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

—  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  10:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change
 * → -- Shelf Skewed  Talk

to
 * → -- Shelf Skewed  Talk

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2017 (UTC)