User talk:Shellievalencia

Welcome!
Hello, Shellievalencia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr. Carlo Dizon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Malcolma (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Dr. Carlo Dizon


The article Dr. Carlo Dizon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Malcolma (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Shellievalencia. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlo Dizon


A tag has been placed on Carlo Dizon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  04:59, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Carlo Dizon
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Carlo Dizon. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps: Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willing to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says [ Click here to contest this speedy deletion].
 * 2) This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Re-adding Carlo Dizon
Please do not re-add articles to the mainspace that have already been deleted previously. Carlo Dizon does not appear to be notable and more importantly, he doesn't actually seem to exist. Despite your claims to the contrary, I haven't been able to actually find anything that shows that he's a real person.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I said this on the Dizon page, but I want to re-state it here. I have checked the Esquire and Lifestyle Asia magazines for mentions of Dizon. They have no record of him, nor does an Internet search show that he actually exists. A search of the places he's reported to be working at does not bring up mention of him at all. For that matter, you claim to be an editor for Lifestyle Asia and Esquire, yet a search under your name (assuming your screen name is your real name) does not bring up any mention of you at all. Nor does a search back up any of your claims. I'm going to openly state that I do not believe that any of the things you are posting are true and that you are uploading complete fabrications to Wikipedia as either a prank or a way to promote someone or something. This can result in you being banned from editing Wikipedia, as this is considered vandalizing.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism -- the persistent recreation of hoax articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Cactus Writer (talk) 07:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)