User talk:Shelly Jeanette

Spam in User:Shelly Jeanette
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on User:Shelly Jeanette, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because User:Shelly Jeanette is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting User:Shelly Jeanette, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 16:40, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Then please explain to me how other libraries are able to be featured in Wikipedia? I have tried to diligently follow the same criteria as they have by making the information about the library factual and as encyclopedic as possible while also providing the necessary references. My entry is very similar to the other Ohio Library entries. Please advise. Shelly Jeanette (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

hang on

Nomination of Holmes County District Public Library for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holmes County District Public Library is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holmes County District Public Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a  message on my talk page. 17:15, 3 May 2011 (UTC)