User talk:Shentino

Sony Computer Entertainment America v. George Hotz
nice work ... dont forget the 'et al' though. (i.e. fail0verflow) Decora (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Message
I left a message for you on my talk page. ;) Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 23:57, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Regarding this edit
I noticed this edit. First, I'll explain why I added those files to the "under scrutiny" table: I don't like doing things in the dark. So while they're not "under scrutiny", as you point out - I thought it was important to publicly log that we deleted them. I'll remove it in a bit. As to what the files were and what to avoid: I very purposely omitted that. From that omission, you can be assured that there is ZERO chance that anyone editing in good faith would ever trip that particular wire - no good faith editor will ever upload those files. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Absolutely not! There was nothing inappropriate about it.  But it looked like you had questions, so I was trying to answer them.  Sorry if I startled you. Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 00:34, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Profit (tv series)
Hello Shentino,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Profit (tv series) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Makro (talk) 18:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Self-hosting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Go. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SimCity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/SimCity check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/SimCity?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Backdraft 2
Hello Shentino,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Backdraft 2 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - ZLEA  T \ C 18:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Backdraft 2 moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Backdraft 2, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:55, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Backdraft 2


Hello, Shentino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Backdraft 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiness
Hello, Shentino,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Shiness for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I have move the article to Draft:Shiness. This will allow you time to work on and provide evidence of notability by providing reliable sources that discuss the game.  ~ GB fan 11:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Shiness


Hello, Shentino. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shiness".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Dragon of Despair for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dragon of Despair is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Dragon of Despair until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wolf Hunting


The article Wolf Hunting has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG. Redirecting to author would be misleading as there is also the article Wolf hunting."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf's Search


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wolf's Search requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 09:49, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Wolf Hunting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolf Hunting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wolf Hunting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wolf's Search


A tag has been placed on Wolf's Search, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RoanokeVirginia (talk) 19:38, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nightwatch Nation for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Nightwatch Nation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nightwatch Nation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Such-change47 (talk) 09:11, 22 December 2021 (UTC)