User talk:Sherebundelkhand

Adding non-notable names
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Last warning for adding non-notable names
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Reverting
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Dikshit. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for using Wikipedia only to endlessly add promotional mentions of a person (probably yourself) with no evidence at all of notability. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)