User talk:Sheridans121

I'm surprised that Mr Phillipps has asked his solicitors to edit his Wikipedia entry.

The deal was a distribution deal. This does not mean that his album was "(licensed worldwide by Universal Records" as originally stated by (I presume) Mr Phillipps. It was not.

Teddy E
One should not find it surprising that it is of legal interest when an individual dedicates so much negative time & effort to a performer. It is obvious to us that you have an agenda & we are aware of the fake myspace profile you are using. If there is any truth in the notion that "Teddy E" is an objectively innocent Wikipedia user (and an ex-Universal employee) then he should have no problem in coming forward and disclosing his true identity.

Sheridans121 (talk) 10:00, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

The aim of Wikipedia is to present factual and accurate information on a subject - and time spent making articles factual and accurate is "positive time", not "negative time". Of course, if any of my contributions are incorrect then you, Todd Sharpville or another Wikipedia reader will make the necessary corrections. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TeddyE (talk • contribs) 16:56, 4 September 2008 (UTC)