User talk:SherooD

Welcome!
Hello, SherooD, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page.
 * Quick introduction to Wikipedia
 * How to write a great article
 * Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLoS
 * Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
 * Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)

''If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal. If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).''

Again, welcome! JFW &#124; T@lk  21:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Please review WP:MEDRS, and consider whether all the sources you added to Tau protein meet with the standards outlined there. I would recommend using secondary sources (reviews, textbook chapters). JFW &#124; T@lk  21:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi JFW! Thank you for the warm welcome! I did read through WP:MEDRS as you suggested, and I wonder if you could explain in more detail your comment above. As concerns the use of secondary sources, I actually did make use of a review of research on the tau protein, but the reviewers had cited several primary sources to support the presented evidence. I presumed that it would make more sense to cite the primary source than the secondary source. Would it have been more appropriate to cite only the review? Thank you for your help,