User talk:SherriSharp

Jerry Galloway
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jerry Galloway, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jerrygalloway.com/tech/bio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The facual information in question is not copyrighted material and is a matter of record in many venues much like names and dates. The specific text in question is also not copyrighted and is used with permission directly from Dr. Galloway (verify: info@jerrygalloway.com)SherriSharp (talk) 07:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jerry Galloway
I have nominated Jerry Galloway, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jerry Galloway. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Adi4094 (talk) 07:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

It seems you have indicated that the individual, Dr. Jerry Galloway, is not notable as the reason for deletion. This is an error. Dr. Galloway is well-known in the United States and beyond. His work has touched many people in many venues and this purely factual article should be made available to the general public. SherriSharp (talk) 07:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see CP. It doesn't matter if someone who owns the rights releases it to Wikipedia, unless we have proof that they have done so. Woogee (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Jerry Galloway
I have nominated Jerry Galloway, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Jerry Galloway&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Adi4094 (talk) 08:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Jerry Galloway
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jerry Galloway, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Jerry Galloway appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jerry Galloway has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 08:38, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

The above answers pretty much sum up what I was going to say. It's both a copyright infringment as well as a conflict of interest. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 09:06, 29 December 2009 (UTC)