User talk:Shibbolethink/Archive 18

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:22, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Religion and philosophy request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Archdeacon of Canterbury&#32; on a "Religion and philosophy" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 15:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Violence against men&#32; on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 08:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Medicine Newsletter - October 2022
Ajpolino (talk) 03:32, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop undiscussed moves
It should be clear by now that the names of these articles should not be changed without discussion. Your recent move of Dachau trials is contrary to WP:OFFICIAL, WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:CONSISTENT. Wallnot (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are misreading WP:RM. Moves can be made when there is reason to believe it won't be disputed. You are now disputing, so I'm happy to revert. I will continue to move pages when I have reason to believe it won't be disputed. I will also continue to revert when a dispute arises. Please refrain from talking to me like I'm a child, and never post on my talk page again. Thanks. The proper place for this discussion is on the talk page of the article in question. — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 20:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't see that Wallnot is talking to you like a child, they are just pointing out a mistake you made, citing the relevant policy. If you are going to ban everyone from your talk page who has a complaint about one of your actions, maybe a collaborative editing project is not for you. Every editor occasionally makes mistakes and bringing them to their attention so that they don't happen again is part of being an editor here. Liz Read! Talk! 01:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are going to ban everyone from your talk page who has a complaint about one of your actions, maybe a collaborative editing project is not for you This is the first time I have ever done so, please don't suggest I am "ban[ning] everyone". You'll see above I am happy to take criticisms from users and do it on a regular basis. As far as I know, it is mostly my business who I allow on my talk page. Please respect my privacy and my personal reasons.As an aside, @Liz, You say above that I made a mistake. Which WP:PAG did I violate? Nothing in WP:RM prevents unilateral moves, granted they are likely to be uncontroversial, and are reverted when disputed. RMs are not mandatory, as CFDs are. I was moving a page to be where a prior move discussion on that page had decided to place it. In a way in which is entirely separate and distinct from any recent related move discussion, and involving an official name. If I'm regularly violating policy, I would absolutely like to know. Thanks — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 01:16, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Wallnot I want to apologize for overreacting, you were doing what you thought was right, and I took it the wrong way in the context of on our prior interactions. I maintain that the move was in order, that your disputing it was also in order, as was my reversion. But I could have handled it better. You can feel free to post on my talk page. But I would also say, I don't really think "it should be clear by now that the names of these articles should not be changed without discussion" was the best way to broach the topic, either. My overreaction was worse, but I'd ask you to be just the slightest bit more collegial. Thanks — Shibboleth ink  (♔ ♕) 01:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Apology accepted. As you say, I could have been more collegial as well. Sorry for that. Wallnot (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2022 (UTC)