User talk:ShieldOfValour

February 2022
Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  GY Fan ★  09:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Luciferian 𖤐  13:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 14:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.


 * Not here, editing logged out to circumvent editing restrictions, accusing other editors of being agents for governments, refusal to get it. Canterbury Tail talk 15:12, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

OK you won, now every trace of human-trafficking has been removed from Xuzhou Chinese page, not just what I added in the leading paragraph. And they blocked me from posting on my own talk page. And all the Chinese editors editing on my English page. Congratulations. This is not done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShieldOfValour (talk • contribs)
 * I don't see any Chinese editors editing your English Wikipedia page other than someone placing a warning about your personal attacks earlier and to remove personal attacks. And what happens on the Chinese Wikipedia has nothing to do with the English Wikipedia, the two are completely separate sites and not connected and we have no control over what happens there, just the English Wikipedia. You are welcome to submit an unblock request as above, but you will have to agree to abide by Wikipedia's policies and style guidelines, along with stopping accusing other editors of being agents for countries. Canterbury Tail talk 16:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
 * for your reference: Special:Diff/1072610714. -- Luciferian 𖤐  04:53, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh I saw it, but thank you. Canterbury Tail talk</i> 13:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * There is an entire section talking about it in the Xuzhou article: § Kidnapping and Abducting Women for Forced Marriages; and in the Chinese article zh:徐州, in the "law and order" section (§ 治安) there's a wikilink to an entire article regarding the incident zh:徐州八孩母親事件, therefore the claim "now every trace of human-trafficking has been removed from Xuzhou Chinese page" is very untrue. "And they blocked me from posting on my own talk page" is because you were abusing your talk page and consistently attacking other editors, including quote, "go f yourself", "I couldn't care less if the fact is being accepted or not by you bunch of 5 cents. You all go f yourselves", etc., are blatantly personal attacks and clearly unacceptable uncivilized behavior (zh policy). Stop victim playing. -- Luciferian 𖤐  01:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)