User talk:Shietal

Shietal the articles you are chosing are important for wikipedia(well thats what the wiki users over the world feel) hence your articles have been deleted. why dont you try creating a article as a sub section of an already existing article. for example you could expand on the L&T page itself. Vedantgupta7890 (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

SHIETAL- YOU NEED TO START WORKING ON THE ARTICLESukalpachakrabarti (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2011 (UTC)SC

Speedy deletion nomination of Larsen & Turbo ECC Concord


A tag has been placed on Larsen & Turbo ECC Concord requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. peterl (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of L&T Concord


A tag has been placed on L&T Concord, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Σ  talk  contribs  03:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article, primarily because it was purely promotional, but also because it gave no real indication of encyclopedic  notability

A Wikipedia article needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. It also needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do. Don't talk about the overall importance of the subject--talk about what they have accomplished. Remember not to copy from a web site -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable.

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients--that sort of content is considered promotional. Keep in mind that the goal of an encyclopedia is to say things in a concise manner, which is not the style of  press releases or  web sites, which are usually more expansive.

For further information see our FAQ about business, organizations, and articles like this and also WP:FIRST.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of what the subject wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

Please do not reintroduce the article in its present form, or you are likely to be blocked as an exclusive promotional account.  DGG ( talk ) 06:48, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Larsen & Toubro CSR initiatives


A tag has been placed on Larsen & Toubro CSR initiatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Acroterion   (talk)   02:08, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of L&T's Vision To Ensure Sustainability


A tag has been placed on L&T's Vision To Ensure Sustainability, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.  Teapot  george Talk  11:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop
Read again the good advice above under the heading "Status and advice". The articles you are posting are far too promotional - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a noticeboard, it is not for promotion of any kind, and articles require a WP:Neutral point of view. Moreover, I strongly suspect that your articles are copied from the company's website or other documents, in which case they are copyright violations. If you continue to post material of this kind, you may be blocked from editing without further warning.

I have also removed promotional material from your user page. User pages are intended for the volunteers, who are here to help build the encyclopedia, to say something about themselves, if they choose, to help communication within the project. They are not for substantial content... that is unrelated to Wikipedia. If you want to use a sub-page for article development, see Help:Userspace draft for how to do that; but advertisements and copyright violations are not permitted anywhere in WiIkipedia.

JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 16 September 2011 (UTC)