User talk:Shikhakaul

Welcome!
Please start by learning quite a bit more about Wikipedia, if you are convinced this is the course you want to follow. However. Once the subject has reached a level of wp:notability, you won't have to do this, as Wikipedia editors with an interest will do it for you. This is generally a better approach. - Sinneed  04:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Self-published material
On my talk page, you wrote: Hi Sinneed,

Thanks a lot for replying I do understand there are some rules and regulations to be followed and I  do understand that Wikipedia is not about fame and popularity.Its just  we had been trying to post the page from long time and every single  moment the content is being deleted .I would like to tell you we are not  doing it for fame and popularity.

We are putting this content on Wikipedia, just want people to know more about Mr.Kent Emmons.

Secondly the content has been provided to us by Mr.Kent Emmons itself as I had  told you in my previous talk.Mr.Kent is also even keen to know that why  this is happening.

Hope you will understand what kind of status we are on right now.

It was really nice having a conversation with you.I will appreciate if you could help us further in this case.

With Loads of Thanks  —Preceding  unsigned comment added by Shikhakaul (talk • contribs) 05:38, 3 March 2010 (UTC) Once the subject reaches the level of wp:notability needed, one of the fans (or nonfans, or just an interested person) will create the page from the readily available coverage in published media. WP is built on these, not on information from the subjects. Please feel free *NOT* to contact me with further arguments about this.

Hopefully, you will feel free to publish the subject's information on any of the zillions of venues intended for self-published material. WP is probably not one of them. Thank you.- Sinneed  14:09, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, please review wp:COI, and please remember to sign your talk page posts with ~.

Finally, if your interest is in Wikipedia, not the subject, perhaps you should work on the 10 million or so other articles. After a while, the problems with the approach you are using now will be obvious. And you might come back and work on the subject's article with more success... or understand why you shouldn't. Remember, the purpose here is to write an encyclopedia. All the best.- Sinneed  14:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Your addition to Kent Emmons has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. - Sinneed  13:19, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Last Warning
You have been warned repeatedly to keep to a neutral point a view. You have been warned repeatedly to stop inserting copies of wp:copyrighted work. If you continue this behaviour, you will most certainly be unable to edit the encyclopedia. Please contribute meaningful information, cited to published, generally wp:reliable sources, keeping to a wp:neutral point of view. If you do not know how to tell if a work is copyrighted, seek assistance outside Wikipedia. This should not be a problem, as you should be putting the content of the sources In You Own Words, not copying at all. Stop now.- Sinneed  13:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 1 week, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Shii (tock) 05:57, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Kaulshikha for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. - Sinneed  14:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)