User talk:Shimeru/Archive 10

A previous articles for deletion debate you oversaw.
Hello Shimeru, I'm interested in what criteria you use to judge whether or not there is a consensus to delete. I have been considering nominating "United States and state terrorism" for another shot at deletion as the article is hopelessly biased and efforts to address this have gotten nowhere over the course of the articles inclusion on Wikipedia. (Please note that I am not second guessing what transpired, only trying to figure out whether it is worth perusing and how best to present the case) Is consensus considered unanimity, majority, plurality? Are there stated guidelines for judging this? Thanks for your time. V7-sport (talk) 01:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

This page was remade can you place in the past history. Thanks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ben_Hansbrough

24.239.153.58 (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:03, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Ben Hansbrough
why'd you delete the ben hansbrough page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.234.137 (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * According to Articles for deletion/Ben Hansbrough. Shi  meru  01:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Help Please
Help please! There are more than several software company pages in Canada with factual info. Can you please help me reinstate the page (or at least get a copy for editing) and instruct me on how to not have this classified as advertising. Page --> User:MichelleWestMarketer/DisclosureNet — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichelleWestMarketer (talk • contribs) 14:50, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look and reply on your talk page. Shi  meru  17:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:26, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Bold restoration of Dieselpunk
Hi,

I was reviewing the decision made on the deletion of Dieselpunk. It seems that the article was significantly updated from the original AfD. I was able to find multiple sources including Gazette publishing that shows this article is not OR. Also the concensus seems to suggest keep. I was planning to revert and if you would like you can re AfD, is there any objection to this? Valoem  talk  16:30, 14 July 2011 (UTC)


 * If you feel that you have reliable sources, by all means, go for it. I doubt I'll be AfDing it -- I close AfDs sometimes, but rarely nominate articles any more.  Shi  meru  02:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Milan Lalkovič
Hello - is it possible to restore this article - this player makes his debut at 1500 GMT and thus will become notable BBC sport] Thanks Zanoni (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

AfD review request
I would like you to review Articles for deletion/Croatia–Mongolia relations (2nd nomination) again, in light of three things: Thanks in advance. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 22:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You closed it as no consensus without it having been relisted. It could have been given some more time instead.
 * The keep !votes were mostly contested based on WP:V and WP:NOR and AFAICT this wasn't answered. Therefore, they might be invalid.
 * It's been another year and the article is still in the same state, proving my point on it being hopeless.


 * That seems like good reason to renominate it to me. I'm not about to simply delete it outright, though.  Shi  meru  04:50, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Ahalya
Hi Shimeru. I saw your name in Peer_review/volunteers. I am trying to move the article to FA status and have initiated a peer review. Your critic would be appreciated at Peer review/Ahalya/archive1. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 11:54, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary
Wishing Shimeru a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 01:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Deleted Article
Dear Shimeru,

First off I apologize for any missteps I have had in the Wikipedia editing process. I hope I am following correct talk page guidelines. Anyway, I created an article entitled "Steve Obsitnik" about a candidate running for Congress in CT. The article was deleted and I saw that you are flagged to return deleted articles. Could I recieve the text back? And would there be a place to go to check why it was deleted? Thank you for your help!

William Sadock

P.S. It originally had POV issues, but I took out the bias and it was kept up for a couple days after during which thime the flag for deletion was removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William.Sadock (talk • contribs) 15:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. Slowly understanding the way Wikipedia works. I can use the one in my sandbox. I forgot about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William.Sadock (talk • contribs) 18:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

AfDs
Hi mate, just wondering if there was a particular reason you closed those AfDs that had only just been relisted? Did you disagree with the relists? You didn't really provide a rationale in either close or your edit summaries - just thought it was worth checking with you. Cheers, Stalwart 111  04:12, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, I think I've worked it out - the notice above my post. Yeah, glad you've decided to use your tools today to keep from losing them, but you should probably be a bit more careful about closing AfDs in today's log - those are going to be either new or newly relisted. Try the logs from 7-8 days ago where closes will be required, yeah? Cheers, Stalwart 111  04:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC).


 * My mistake. They were still linked from the old log when I got around to them, and I wasn't careful enough.  Sorry about that. 174.79.190.66 (talk) 00:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * ...And being logged in would probably help. Shi  meru  00:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, understand, no problem! If I find anything in the next couple of days that requires and admin I'll ping you; let you use your tools! Ha ha. Have a good one! Stalwart 111  00:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Here's an obvious WP:SNOW close, if you happen to be about. Stalwart 111  10:41, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WormTT(talk) 11:14, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux  Talk 23:56, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. — xaosflux  Talk 00:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Tinywarz
This page was deleted back on 19:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC) by yourself. The only ever editing I did was on this wiki and I care about the game and the community although it has lost many users over the years. It still has a small community and I would like to compile the deleted info and archive the data. Please since I am a wiki newbie and have no idea what I am do, please help me with getting this wiki un-delete for a couple days so I may copy the info and put it on a web domain that can be used by the community. After about 3 days I should have all the pages and it may be deleted again.

Thank you and I have no idea how this interface works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfencenking (talk • contribs) 15:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC) Dfencenking (talk) 15:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Gary Brooks Faulkner, deleted page
Now that Mr Faulkner is the subject of a movie (Army Of One (2016)), I believe the circumstances have changed making him a notable figure. My understanding is that would now make him eligible for undeletion. 50.35.104.187 (talk) 07:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Glass blower Peter Ivy
. There is currently no article on Japanese-American glass blower and artist by the name of Peter Ivy. I am wondering if you'd be willing to write a short article about him on Wikipedia? There is a YouTube video about him which you can see here. Enjoy!-Davidbena (talk) 14:58, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

FAR for Kitsune
I have nominated Kitsune for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  04:47, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Merge school
Template:Merge school has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --Trialpears (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kitsune in popular culture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kitsune in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kitsune in popular culture& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)