User talk:Shinilpm

Welcome!

 * }

July 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kuriakose Mor Theophilos has been reverted. Your edit here to Kuriakose Mor Theophilos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://mgjsmkmgm.blogspot.in/2012/06/board-of-directors.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of MGJSM


A tag has been placed on MGJSM, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be a clear copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ï¿½ (talk) 12:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Mgjsm logo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Mgjsm logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 17:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=580306288 your edit] to Kunnamkulam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:25, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * * Arthat Simhasana church Tomb of St Sleeba Mor Osthatheos

St Paulose Mor Coorilos
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of St Paulose Mor Coorilos, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.syriacchristianity.info/bio/MorKoorilosKochuparambil.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:10, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of St Paulose Mor Coorilos


A tag has been placed on St Paulose Mor Coorilos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.syriacchristianity.info/bio/MorKoorilosKochuparambil.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:07, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2016
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Malankara Jacobite Syrian Orthodox church, you may be blocked from editing. ''Please stop inserting unencyclopedic material: this is an encyclopedia, not a church bulletin. And those colors...'' Drmies (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

WP:PRIMARY
Hi there, your edits here at List of highest-grossing Indian films have been reverted. The 320 crore box office value for Kabali is attribute to the film's producer per the reference you provided. We don't use primary sources like producers, directors, actors, distributors for controversial data like film financials, because these people have every reason to inflate or deflate the numbers to suit their personal gain. We only care what secondary sources that have arrived at these values independently have to say. Feel free to discuss at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films if you wish. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Kabali again
Hi there, regarding your recent inflation of Kabali's gross figures, you should familiarize yourself with the various discussions about this. You can find them at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films (you may have to look through the archives) and here. The high values, (such as the 650 crore value you've derived from a slideshow--not a great reference by any means) is the subject of dispute. Both IBT and Firstpost cast serious doubts about the values, in part because they were obviously tacking on 200 crore in pre-release income made from satellite and music rights. These values would never be included in gross figures, because gross figures in every film article are only supposed to reflect box office receipts. If you wish to discuss it, I'd recommend you open a conversation at the Indian cinema task force since this is an issue that requires widespread community input, but there is currently no consensus to blindly regurgitate the highest financial value we can find for Kabali. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello, I'm AG47. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kakkanad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please do not edit the article until you have reliable sources, as this is a sensitive issue on the social media. Feel free to discuss this issue in the talk page. Also, Try not to add external website links to the body of an article articles. See WP:EL for more details.

Cheers..   AG 47  ' Talk 17:47, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kakkanad, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Do not edit the article until you have reliable sources. Discuss this issue in the talk page. Also, Try not to add external website links to the body of an article. See WP:EL for more details. Improve the article by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links. See WP:NPOV and WP:NOTPROMOTION for more information.

Cheers  AG 47  ' Talk 11:51, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kakkanad. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''You have not given any valid references. Also, do not not add external website links to the body of an article. See WP:EL for more details. Improve the article by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links. See WP:NPOV and WP:NOTPROMOTION for more information. AG 47  ' Talk 09:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MGJSM Pallikkara Region


The article MGJSM Pallikkara Region has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced article about an organization. No claim to notability made"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 17:31, 25 April 2019 (UTC)