User talk:Shinjiyo21

June 2019
Hello, I'm Aranya. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Encyclopedia Dramatica have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Aranya (talk &#124; contribs) 04:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia's Content Vs. Encyclopedia Dramatica's Content Wikipedia relies on verifiability, not truth. ED relies on the lulz, and baseless jokes don't make good satire. Wikipedia does not rely on primary sources, and hates academic sources. ED would post a photo from your high school yearbook if it's lulzy enough. Activists use Wikipedia to skew articles to try to get NORP sympathy. ED shits on everyone for the sake of cheap jokes. Wikipedos will argue by throwing around abbreviations. EDiots will laugh at you and mock your argument. Wikipedia lets shitposters like Ryulong run rampant. ED has no problem telling its own founder to fuck off. Wikipedia is almost always online. ED goes down every other day or some shit. This section needs no witty dick jokes. Wikipedia is a giant punchline. Atticiusfinch (talk) 04:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC)