User talk:Shinjoya

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Burushaski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singular ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Burushaski check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Burushaski?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:18, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 19
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Pran filmography ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pran_filmography check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pran_filmography?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Dasi, Daman, Arsi, Ragini and Sangeeta
 * Rehman (actor) ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rehman_%28actor%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rehman_%28actor%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Chingari, Chand and Paras

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Sam Sailor 07:26, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Amrish Puri ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Amrish_Puri check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Amrish_Puri?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Ricky and Waris
 * Kirat Singh ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Kirat_Singh check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Kirat_Singh?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Rana

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Rajput. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Rajput is covered by sanctions under WP:ARBIPA
Hello Shinjoya. Caste articles have been the target of disruptive editing in the past. We even have a concept called 'Caste boosterism' to describe a kind of behavior that is often seen with caste articles. Please ensure that your editing is neutral, not promotional, and that your changes have consensus. Admins have the authority to intervene when problems occur in this area. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * With due respect, I would like to respond that I am pretty aware of the sanctions related to caste articles. My editing has been neutral so far. How does adding a few images of forts in the appropriate section be considered promotional? My discussion is already going on at Talk:Rajput and so far, I haven't got any valid arguments. Just because a user removed the images without discussion a few months back, how does it mean that they cannot be added in the future? If any such discussion took place in the past, I am not aware of them. I have been continuously asking Heba Aisha to present the old discussions on this topic, but she hasn't presented any so far. Shinjoya (talk) 05:53, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Its on talk page itself, if some of them got archived, I would like to request, to post the link of long discussion we underwent there. Heba Aisha (talk) 06:24, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I haven't participated in any dicussion of fort images before. So I don't know where they might be. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Over this weekend, I have been looking at your edits of the Rajput article as well as your past edit history on Rajput related pages. You have attempted removals in the past on diet, alcohol etc. and other editors have reinstated your removed of sourced content.LukeEmily (talk) 14:12, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * LukeEmily, For editors like us, Wikipedia is meant for editing. We add and remove content on articles considering its relevance and reliability of sources. Thats how we have grown to a healthy encyclopaedia with 6.3 million articles. Currently, some issues are being discussed at Talk:Rajput. You may join the discussions. Shinjoya (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
 * As the principal author of the FA India, the sole author of its history section and co-author with of two caste articles Jat people (also former pastoralists or other non-elite groups) whose antecedents of caste upliftment are similar if many centuries later than the Rajput's) and Kurmi I can state with a high degree of certainty that user:Shinjoya's edits are not only in the realm of caste boosterism, but also of a piece with the narrative of Hindu chauvinism because they promote only certain "castes," which are seen to be (i.e. have been reconstructed in false histories to be) the Hindu elite which was the bulwark against the ruling Islamic conquerors of India between 1200 CE and 1757 CE.  This editor has also been ganging up with two others in a feeding frenzy of like-minded recent edits.  I have made a post on Talk:Prithviraj Chauhan.   Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  11:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * @ User:Fowler&fowler, you are engaged with three users including me in a content dispute here. When you started losing debate, you began harrassing me with comments like this, this and this. Then, you did WP:HOUNDING and reverted my edits here. You also made false accusations on me for making POV edits without any due explanation. User:TrangaBellam supported your stance in the said content dispute but none of us accused you two of doing meat puppetry. Then, on what basis do you make false accusations on us? It was you who made objectionable remark on Rajasthan and its people and you also "praised" cavalry of Muslim forces here and here. Then on what basis, are you accusing me of POV editing?


 * You are an experienced writer. If you are not satisfied with the ongoing debate on content dispute, you always have other options like WP:Dispute resolution. Such misbehaviour towards other editors who don't disagree with you is simply uncalled for and not in line with WP:CIVILITY. Shinjoya (talk) 15:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter if you know about the sanctions, without an official alert, normally yearly, they cannot be applied to you. Which is why I have a list of sanctions that I am officially aware of at the top of my talk page.  Doug Weller  talk 16:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thanks !

-Shinjoya (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Rajput have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. This edit also removed sourced content  Heba Aisha (talk) 00:55, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Please build consensus on talk page. Heba Aisha (talk) 01:28, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you edited the article on Khap without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! -- Toddy1 (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Your email
Hi Shinjoya, you emailed me requesting indefinite protection of Maratha (caste). Indefinite protection is reserved for the most vandalized pages and only when other methods have not been effective. This is not the case at the Maratha article. In the three days since protection expired on June 11, there have been two edits by an IP. The first changed a link and the second was a self-revert three minutes later. This is not enough to justify protection of any length, let alone indefinite protection. Also, for the sake of transparency, please make routine protection requests on-wiki. If there are sensitive or private matters you need to discuss, then email is fine, but I and most other administrators prefer public discussion whenever possible. — Wug·a·po·des​ 22:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * As you had mentioned on your talk page that you are a bit busy and won't be able to attend talk page, I mailed you. I hope you didn't mind. I will wait and see if IP vandalism doesn't start again at Maratha (caste). Anyway, Thanks for responding. Shinjoya (talk) 07:45, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

ANI close: topic ban
I have closed the ANI discussion concerning you as consensus in favor of a community-imposed indefinite topic ban from caste-related topics, broadly construed. This ban can only be appealed to the Wikipedia community at WP:AN; you can appeal the ban by opening a request there. As a nontrivial number of editors in the discussion favored a 90-day ban, I would recommend waiting at least 90 days before appealing. signed,Rosguill talk 17:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Run n Fly. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to ZyCoV-D have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not add WP:PROMOTIONAL statements as you did. Run n Fly (talk) 04:22, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Its not a violation of WP:PROMOTIONAL . You aren't supposed to remove the content as it is relevant and backed by RS. Shinjoya (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Please use the talk page to discuss your edits. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

When someone edits the page on ZyCoV-D, they get a warning message., which reads in part: You prohibited from adding biomedical content without WP:MEDRS-compliant sources in this article and are subject to discretionary sanctions while editing this page. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Notification of discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19
Your edits to ZyCoV-D are clearly covered by discretionary sanctions concerning COVID-19. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

ANI-notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Run n Fly (talk) 12:18, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a net negative to the encyclopedia. See. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:37, 10 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Note in case the user appeals the block: I'll be away on vacation next week. Any admin who reviews this block, please just make the call; there's no need to consult me. Bishonen &#124; tålk 19:41, 10 July 2021 (UTC).

Unblock discussion
I'm afraid I see no indication that you understand why you were blocked, what to do instead, or what constructive edits you would make. You cannot say, "Oh, time's up! Unblock me now under the standard offer!" You must address the many reasons for your block and the many concerns raised about your editing. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:04, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

I think [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shinjoya&type=revision&diff=1033112518&oldid=1033095695&diffmode=source Daniel Case is spot on with his earlier decline. I see no evidence of any improvement since then.] -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Clearly, a topic ban on COVID/any topic related to MEDRS to be added to the one on Caste is in order, should user manage an unblock. Please,, describe what areas you might constructively edit in, and what those constructive edits might be. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 22:16, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @ Deepfriedokra, I wish to create and edit articles related to different places (villages and towns) of India like I have done in past before getting blocked. Apart from this, I plan to make edits to my other areas of interest like Indian history, Indian domestic politics, international politics and cricket. I will also patrol the "recent changes" page and revert any visible vandalism from users. Shinjoya (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Please describe how your previous edits were unconstructive and what you would do in similar circumstances. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 16:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
 * , Earlier, I was involved in editing volatile topics like caste and covid. My editing style was too bold which lead me into edit wars with several other users. But from now on, I will edit with more patience and participate with fellow users in achieving consensus, before going ahead with edits. Shinjoya (talk) 14:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Endorse unblock. Please opine. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 15:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Shinjoya, have you been doing anything to practice constructive editing and give examples of more patience while blocked from the English Wikipedia? Such as editing another language Wikipedia, and/or one of the Wikimedia sister projects? If you have, have you done it successfully, without getting in trouble? And if you have not, I think you should, before being unblocked here. I would suggest at least two months of editing another Wikimedia project, or several. Remember, you are only blocked on the English Wikipedia (as far as I know). Bishonen &#124; tålk 16:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC).