User talk:Shirai2013

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Subway Surfers has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Subway Surfers was changed by Shirai2013 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867918 on 2013-07-09T22:54:02+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Subway Surfers
Please stop adding rumors to the Subway Surfers page. We're an encyclopedia, we only include facts. 113.141.185.196 (talk) 04:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Subway Surfers, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. EuroCarGT 01:09, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I reverted your addition to Subway Surfers. Unsourced speculation about future cities and characters don't belong in the article. Please use the talk page at Talk:Subway Surfers to discuss the changes you want to make. Garion96 (talk) 12:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Subway Surfers
What do you think of the rumors we add our page Subway Surfers?? For thus we can arouse the curiosity of many people and it will become known to wikipedia as well, people have some ideas of what the next World Tour Subway Surfers

September 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Subway Surfers, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ''Please stop adding rumored future locations to this article. It's very disruptive and not encyclopedic content. So please stop.'' ///Euro Car  GT  21:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Subway Surfers. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:19, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes but I only put Moscow as it is the version released today
 * No, you also added Madrid . Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll stop it and thank you for telling me, grateful
 * The notice is important, and there's not supposed to be spaces inside the double brackets. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but you do not think this way, people who visit the page on wikipedia Subway Surfers, are more interested in knowing about cities like New York, Rio de Janeiro, and Tokyo among others!!

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Subway Surfers. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:52, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Don't remove the warning on Subway Surfers as you did with this edit. Removing it many times without even trying to discuss it on the talk page is a good way of getting blocked. Garion96 (talk) 21:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you !!!

FINAL WARNING! Your contributions history is marred by a long series of disruptive vandalism on a single article page (the ONLY article you care to edit, which is very much against guidelines BTW). If you have nothing else to do but waste the time of serious contributors and administrators your place isn't here. Seriously, why don't you go and hang out on the SubwaySurfers Wiki, where you'd probably be most welcome? FYI, every action on Wikipedia is permanently archived and traceable. Quit playing possum and acting meek when you've been warned, just to come back and redo the same thing after a while. Trolling does not go unnoticed on Wikipedia. Shape up or don't bother making hollow apologies. Next time you disrespect the entire community's commitment and pretend not to understand the obvious AGAIN, I'll report you on the disciplinary noticeboard for severe and swift sanctions. We have better things to do than play childish mind games. Issar El-Aksab (talk) 02:28, 13 November 2013 (UTC)