User talk:Shirakawas

Speedy deletion of Risako Kawahara
A tag has been placed on Risako Kawahara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:20, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
 * For repeatedly attacking another user, I've currently blocked this account from editing for 48 hours; please keep a cool head, and contribute more productively once this block expires. If abusive behavior continues, you may blocked again. To appeal this block, you may use the unblock template on this page. – Luna Santin  (talk) 10:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)