User talk:Shirar18

Copyright issue with Daniela Mendelsohn}}}
Hello. Concerning your contribution, :, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, : appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. : has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at :, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. FreeKresge 02:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. --FreeKresge 02:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

ArtWorks: The Naomi Cohain Foundation
Hi. You have assertion that you have permission from the artworks foundation to use this on Wikipedia.

Please note that if the use is for Wikipedia only, Wikipedia will not accept it. It has to be released under the GFDL license which allows others to modify the content.

Secondly, the talk page of the article cannot verify permissions. You (or really Daniela, who owns the copyright) need to email the permissions account (permissions-en at wikipedia dot org). Also read Copyright, because it contains important information about the GFDL license.

Finally, releasing information doesn't guarantee that the article will stay. Any information from the Artworks Foundation about the Artworks Foundation is still a primary source, and articles need to have secondary reliable sources. Also, read the article on conflict of interest. ColourBurst 03:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

If you keep reposting deleted material under different titles, it may be considered as vandalism, leading to a block. jimfbleak 09:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)