User talk:Shirt58/Archive 5

Allies of World War II
Just deleted some junk that I thought was obvious vandalism. I suppose I should have said that in the Edit Summary. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 20:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: The Labor Split III - an offer you can't refuse
Lol, I'll do what I can. This isn't my area of expertise though. I was listening to Kim Edward Beazley's memoirs (narrated by his son) that I received as part of the second prize for a quiz night, and I kept on coming across this Alan Reid fellow ... so I thought he *needed* a Wikipedia article! Graham 87 11:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Hey, why did ya do that? Graham 87 12:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologee-ies?. It was was an obvious mistake on my part?. I'll fix it up if you don't get in first? --Shirt58 (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Fixed, before I found your message. Graham 87 13:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * No worries mate, I've done that plenty of times before. Graham 87 12:54, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:Picador Richard Flanagan 2002 GouldsBookofFish cover.jpg
Cheers. Didn't mean to step on your toes, but did look like it could do with a cleaner scan. --jjron (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Trust me, my toes are completely unscathed. I sometimes review my contributions and think, hmm, I really should fix some of the book cover pix I've uploaded, but due to my short attention span am easily distracted and... ooh, just Googled up a new reliable reference for Hevisaurus!  Oops, sorry, what was the question?--Shirt58 (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Vagrancy (people)
My edit summary was hardly misleading, it was lazy and empty, but the edit was hardly nonconstructive as it removed a very biased, unsourced (the only source were for statistics counterproductive to the arguement). 174.112.18.193 (talk) 03:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bryce Retzlaff


The article Bryce Retzlaff has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * late round draft pick with no senior games

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

"notes" section for image files on commons?
Hey all,

The article Genesis Suite currently has a number of "see copy in the commons" mentions. Those mentions have been arguably adequately referenced in the main referencing of the article; what is needed is link/s to those commons files. So, how do I do this? helpme--Shirt58 (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi Shirt58. You can pipe a link to the commons images referred to. To pipe a link directly to a commons media file without having the file display, you simply need to prefix a colon in the link code. So, for example, where it says in the article currently "see copy in the commons", you might change this to "see copy in the commons ". I assume all of the images of the documents are in the Commons category for Genesis Suite. Here I am attempting to provide a mechanical solution to your question, but I'm not 100% sure the article's in-text referral to these images is the best way to go.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

National Congress of Australia's First Peoples
Sorry, keep forgetting about this. You seem to know more abt it than I do. Though sometime I'll see if I can find out whether they're more than just a talking shop.--Misarxist 09:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Bryce Retzlaff for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Bryce Retzlaff, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bryce Retzlaff until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Mixed martial arts - MC Hammer
Thanks. 63.131.4.149 (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Not sure how to talk back! Moner Manush was my first article and i'm still trying to figure this out. Thanks a ton for helping out. I wanted to put the poster I uploaded to commons but the resolution was weird and the pic got layered. How do I upload a pic to a page directly? Thanks again and do feel free to make corrections —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adaabata (talk • contribs) 07:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Re:Thank you!
No problem, I make it a habit to add some standard info to species articles I come across. Cheers and keep up the good work! Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Thames Materials
Please see my comment on the Thames Materials Talk page. Thank you Markhamilton (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

For your mis-contributions to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science
--Shirt58 (talk) 13:51, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Response to Mini WP:RFC
JamesBWatson (talk) 12:30, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Heads up -
Hi - someone may have told you this before, but just a heads up: you should be waiting more than a minute before tagging articles with A1 or A3, as you did in Confirm friend. I've heard on multiple occasions, that 5 minutes is a good limit on when you can tag pages with these templates. Cheers!  ∙:∙:.:  pepper  :.:∙:∙   12:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

...and once again: JamesBWatson (talk) 16:40, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hevisaurus
Hello! Your submission of Hevisaurus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Link
Interesting link. And really good. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 20:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

For your review
When discussing films or actors who do not quite yet have the coverage to merit inclusion, you might consider referring to WP:TOOSOON rather that WP:HAMMER as the former deals with actors and films and the latter deals with albums.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Cryingwind
It was a tough call, since they were editing productively. I almost just left a warning, but I realized it wouldn't be fair to everyone else I've blocked for the same reason. Daniel Case (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that "Crying Wind" is a notorious fraud, and the editor of the same name was desperately trying to cover up that fact by purging the article of any useful information. I've removed the unsound links, and provided links to solid reliable sources about her scamful history. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks like a failure of due diligence on my part. But, much better to have made a mistake based on an excess rather than a lack of good faith, I would think.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)