User talk:Shirulashem/Archives/2009/March

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Moggy Hollow Natural Area
Hi, could you please take a second look at Moggy Hollow Natural Area? I believe it is more of a start class than a stub class article at this time. Full disclosure, it is up for a DYK which would be negatively affected by Stub status, but I do believe it meets the Start criteria. Thanks dm (talk) 14:23, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Done.  shirulashem     (talk)   14:25, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks dm (talk) 14:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sonic Irrigator
Thank you very much for that. Do I need to add more content now so it won't be deleted? Sonic Irrigator (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

wp:HSITES
WikiProject Historic Sites is opened up. I took the liberty of assuming your support for the wikiproject meant you wanted to join as a member, and I copied your signature to the Members list on the main page. Please visit and add to, or remove, your listing there. It would be great to hear about what you're interested in the Wikiproject becoming, in your member comment and/or at the Talk page, shortcut wt:HSITES. Thanks for your support! doncram (talk) 17:35, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Kraków pogrom
You recently set the Kraków pogrom page as a Start-Class, and I am curious what drives such assertions. Thanks KosherJava (talk) 12:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi. For the evaluation criterion that we use at WP Judaism, you can take a look at this page. As far as Kraków pogrom is concerned, I've reassessed it as a C after taking another look. If you want some info on further developing the article, take a look here. Please let me know if you have any questions. Please also keep in mind the following Wikipedia guideline: "It is vital that people not take these assessments personally. It is understood that we all have different priorities and different opinions about what makes a perfect article." Please let me know if you have any more questions.  shirulashem     (talk)   21:41, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history Coordinator Elections
As a member of the WikiProject who is running for coordinator it is so go great to see people getting involved. It seems that some people truly do care about the future of the WikiProject. Keep Up the Good work. Have A Great Day! Lord R. T. Oliver  The Olive Branch 01:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

ww2censor (talk) 02:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm
Hello there, I am not aware of your situation relating to my edits as there is nothing wrong with them?

Please elaborate great Sir, thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.51.110 (talk) 00:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

lv
I used a previously cited source. The CIA World Factbook. It would be hypocritical for you to accept only the data that suits your interests, while choosing to omit others. I was simply updating the old statistics.216.99.53.237 (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * First, you did not cite your source. Second, your edit claimed that the date of the population estimate is July 2009, which is in the future.   shirulashem     (talk)   00:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The source is already cited in the article, and there is no citation for the current "source". Though that may be true if you look at the source, it is listed as July 2009, once again I must reinstate it would be hypocritical to accept a source for only the data you chose to include. And if you do not know an ESTIMATE is an rough calculation, that can be applied to ANY measure. 216.99.53.237 (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have restored your edit and I have added the source, as appropriate. Thank you for pointing this out, although I would have preferred it if you were a little nicer about it.  shirulashem     (talk)   00:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)