User talk:Shirulashem/Archives/2009/May

Are you kidding me?
Really, protecting Duke's page seems a conflict of interest, at the very least... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.83.208 (talk) 02:06, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Just because I'm Jewish and David Duke is an anti-semite doesn't mean that I can't edit his page. Furthermore, if I really let a conflict of interest stand in the way, I certainly wouldn't have protected his page from vandalism ... I would've let the vandalism stand! Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and no matter how much we might disagree with someone or something, there is never an excuse to vandalize. All it does is hurt the integrity of Wikipedia.  shirulashem     (talk)   02:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no integrity in Wikiepedia. That's your first mistake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.83.208 (talk) 02:34, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to UBLP!
Sorry I kept missing you on IRC&mdash;been a bit busy today. If you have any questions, feel free to ask in the main channel or on the project talk page.

Regarding your specific query, with that particular page I think it's pretty safe to assume David Allen (Royal Navy officer) is alive. I would remove Category:Possibly living people and replace it with Category:Living people. In general, we assume people are alive unless (a) we have a reliable source saying they're not alive; or (b) they're too old to be possibly be alive (1905 is the cut-off I use).

Again, welcome and thanks for your help! :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey
Am I behaving in way that makes you happy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.83.208 (talk) 03:13, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Help response...
There's a response to my question on the talk page. Random Checkhead (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Raj thackrey page
Hi I tried to correct the topic title Raj thackrey has time and again clarified that the 'Andolan' is not against North Indians but criminal minded people from UP and Bihar. Could you please tell me why this was rejected as 'Vandalism'. Iwas commenting in good faith.

Abhay —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.182.31 (talk) 15:33, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi, a bot reverted your edit because you placed a link to a youtube clip that looked suspicious. I brought back your edits and put the youtube link in the appropriate section at the end.  shirulashem     (talk)   00:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Greetings and salutations
Wazzup homes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.83.208 (talk) 06:29, 21 May 2009 (UTC)