User talk:Shishir58

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Your question at the Help Desk has been answered, incidentally. BencherliteTalk 17:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pritish Nandy Communications Ltd
A tag has been placed on Pritish Nandy Communications Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 18:08, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Article
Hi Shishir58. I've now userfied the article (moved it into a user subpage in your personal userspace) so you can work on it with little risk of deletion. It seemed a shame to let it be speedy deleted when there was so much content, even though nothing is ever lost completely here, and we could have requested an admin to let you have a copy of the content if deletion had gone ahead. The article is now at User:Shishir58/Pritish Nandy Communications. Note that I've removed the "Ltd.". Wikipedia's naming conventions for companies prefer that we omit it - when the article is ready to go back into articlespace, we'll move it to "Pritish Nandy Communications", which is currently a redirect and which I'll request to be deleted shortly, once the article's old name and talk page have gone.

I'm relatively short on time at present, but will make a start on helping to clean up the article, as long as you're happy for me to do this in your userspace. We can chat about the work in progress on the subpage's own talk page, at User talk:Shishir58/Pritish Nandy Communications. Hope this all helps. Best wishes, Ka renjc 19:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Dear Karenjc. Thank you so much. I am absolutely fine with you working on the article. I noticed you've made some changes already and they're fine. Should we both work on it together or would it be better if you made the changes and both of us could constantly stay in touch over the article in case you need some help with information? My regards.

Some advice...
Please slow down. Several editors are trying to help you, but you keep, intentionally or otherwise, undoing our edits. There is no rush, there is no deadline. And please take heed of the advice that we are giving you. Hope this helps. – ukexpat (talk) 18:13, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Totally unintentional. Apologies. I had no clue that someone was trying to help. I'm unaware of some mistakes I may be making by virtue of the fact that this is my first effort.Shishir58 (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Importance of an article

 * Hi, there's nothing that can be done to change it because this article falls in the category of articles that "cover a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia". That it is of low importance doesn't mean that it is bad; most articles are of low importance, including some cities in India. Capital cities in India can be high importance, while Indian states are of top importance. The place that an article can improve is in its quality scale. Hope that helps. Ncmvocalist (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

It does. Thanks a ton! Shishir58 (talk) 05:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PNC Official Corporate Logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:PNC Official Corporate Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 07:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Eeekster...my first article, Pritish Nandy Communications just went live yesterday. I created an Infobox because Wikipedia said that it was missing and I'm currently trying to upload the PNC logo into the Infobox. I have just finished uploading the jpeg logo onto Wikipedia so can you advise me on how I should go about inserting it into the Infobox? This will hopefully solve the issue of the image being an orphan image. Shishir58 (talk) 07:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually I just managed to do it myself. Please see the infobox. I guess it no longer is an orphaned image. Shishir58 (talk) 08:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pritish Nandy Communications, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  16:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Pritish Nandy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Teapot  george Talk  16:08, 22 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi, who is this contributer you're talking about who maybe connected with the company in question? Shishir58 (talk) 06:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Er..that would be you. – ukexpat (talk) 13:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

That's not fair and more importantly, not right. Please understand that we're all professionals at the end of the day and sometimes the incorrect evaluations or hasty conclusions made by editors, like yourself, is extremely humiliating. I understand that all you're doing is following a prototype but I'm a professional jounalist and for my work to be hacked was hard for me to digest. I am only fighting for what I think is right and fair in my opinion. It's a natural reaction. It would be very childish for you to misinterpret that for being biased towards the company that I'm writing an article on. Just try and go easy on first time editors, if that's not too much to expect. Or given your opinion about me, maybe it is. Shishir58 (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * First please read WP:OWN - when you put anything on Wikipedia you agree that anyone else can and will edit it. We have merely done so to make the article comply with Wikipedia's myriad policies and guidelines, we have not "hacked" it. Second, no we are most definitely not all professionals - the vast majority of Wikipedia editors are volunteers who edit here because we believe in the goals of this project, we are not paid by anyone to do so. – ukexpat (talk) 18:55, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

The rules are not what I'm questioning Ukexpat. There's a very thin line between teaching someone and humiliating someone. I applaud the efforts that you and the rest of the team at Wikipedia are making day in and day out. It's an investment of time and some serious effort. I'm not sure about your other encounters, but a first time editor like myself is here to learn. Unfortunately, I've ended up being accused of certain things that are not true and humiliated as a result of that. Just go through the article's talk page and you'll know. I even tried deleting some older posts because I found it extremely disheartening to read everytime I logged on to see my article. Just go easy on first timers. Everyone is not the same even though you may not have the time or the inclination to judge who is genuine and who is not. Strangely, and I say this again despite Cameron's previous responses, every rule in the book has been applied to my article because I drew your attention to my article on the help desk. I wanted to do it the right way or else I would not have asked for help. There are tons of articles that have sneakily been uploaded with extremely promotional content some even in the same space as the company I've written on.But they get away scot free. Just doesn't seem right or fair. Please remember, for a first time editor, similar articles are a reference to go by. Shishir58 (talk) 07:13, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright permissions
No need to send them to me, just to permissions as set out at WP:IOWN. – ukexpat (talk) 13:12, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Got it. Once the permission is accepted, will they by default put back the images that you deleted onto the pages I created yesterday or would I need to redo that entire process on Commons again? Shishir58 (talk) 15:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * When OTRS (permissions) gets the e-mail they will review and if it acceptable they will undelete and tag the images with an OTRS ticket number indicating that the permission is received and is OK. Then the images can be put back in the article as before. And please note, I did not delete the images, that was done by an administrator at Commons. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

I know. Someone called Martin did and I've had a word with him on my Commons talk page. He pretty much said the same thing. Waiting for the permissions now. Shishir58 (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Back again, don't worry, we keep a careful eye on all articles to ensure that they don't look like adverts. --Cameron Scott (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Posting movie posters is an advert when it's the main product line of the Company we're writing about?? I have received a ticket number from COmmons and the permission to upload these files. What else is a movie production company supposed to upload in terms of visuals?? I have even asked Martin to check if I'm doing it right. Shishir58 (talk) 18:58, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


 * It's not about permissions, it's about placement - that amount of images is overwhelming the amount of text in the article - one or two is fine. But that shows what the company does, adding additional posters doesn't actually provide any additional encyclopaedic informational value. they make films, we get from that two images, ten or twenty doesn't provide any additional information and they are then decorative. --Cameron Scott (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Cameron, I get that. Then why is it that someone else has deleted all of them?? Shishir58 (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Glodyne logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Glodyne logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:2009kumarbuilders.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:2009kumarbuilders.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 06:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Lalit Kumar Jain.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Lalit Kumar Jain.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Indiafirst LOGO.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Indiafirst LOGO.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:39, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IndiaFirst Life Insurance Ltd.


A tag has been placed on IndiaFirst Life Insurance Ltd., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mrmatiko (talk) 09:31, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:IndiafirstLOGO.PNG
Thanks for uploading File:IndiafirstLOGO.PNG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Glod (2).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Glod (2).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:44, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:14669 186758421403 649351403 3040509 3981056 n.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:14669 186758421403 649351403 3040509 3981056 n.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of IndiaFirst Life Insurance Ltd


A tag has been placed on IndiaFirst Life Insurance Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Shirt58 (talk) 15:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Chinmaya.328 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Shirt58 (talk) 13:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ZED Habitats


A tag has been placed on ZED Habitats, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PNC Official Corporate Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PNC Official Corporate Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)