User talk:Shivaay 5

Problematic edits
Hi there, though you probably meant well, your recent edits at 1: Nenokkadine were problematic for a few reasons. For these reasons I have reverted your changes. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 09:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) You removed content without providing an explanation. You should use edit summaries to explain the rationale behind your edits, as other editors will no doubt be confused. Wikipedia is a community editing project, so communication is crucial.
 * 2) You changed the film's critical response summary from "negative" to "mixed" with no explanation, and despite the "negative" being directly sourced. This is disruptive, as it suggests you're making changes to satisfy your personal point of view. We don't do that here. Content must be sourced.
 * 3) You added this language: "Though the film ended as Average at the box office, the film has a huge Cult Status among the Telugu fans and still being considered as the "Path Breaking Film " of Telugu Industry." The content is unsourced and reeks heavily of your personal perspective. We write content from a neutral point of view and we are not here to add our personal opinions or analyses to articles. Please refrain from doing this again. All controversial statements like this must be sourced. Also "cult status" is grossly overused. Everything has a "cult following". For everything created, there's somebody who likes it a lot. It's puffery.
 * 4) You added a bunch of financial data without adding references to support it. As I've said, all controversial data must be supported by reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy (i.e. this means no blogs, no IMDB, no unverified Twitter accounts, no fly-by-night websites, etc.)

Starring parameter reordering
Hi, why did you reorder the cast in the starring parameter of the Infobox in this edit? Without a clear explanation, this sort of thing tends to look like a person is ordering arbitrarily or to their personal preference of actors. Please respond below; I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Brahmotsavam (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diff: - The summary of this film's critical response as "mixed" is unsourced, thus it tends to suggest your own point of view. This is not appropriate for inclusion. You're also arbitrarily converting Indian rupees to US dollars, which creates a situation requiring this content to be updated perpetually. There's no real reason for that. Please see this conversation at WT:ICTF.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:34, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rakta Charitra, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)